Then what is even the problem you’re attempting to convey?

Oh, don’t worry, she hasn’t. The absolute best-case scenario is she realized she can just collect a pension once January rolls around and chose to get out of the current grift while the getting was good.

Saying Mamdani “worked with” Trump implies there were compromises made by Mamdani to secure Trump’s help. Where did Mamdani compromise on the platforms he campaigned on while talking with Trump?

Most people paying attention aren’t falling for it. Like me, they’re just in the “Let Them Fight” camp. I don’t trust her as far as I can throw the Empire State Building, but any chaos she sows in the GOP in the meantime is cool with me.

Not all DVDs can be read now, though, not unless you also have an old standalone DVD player.

The answer to the first question is yes, explicitly because the answer to your second question is also yes.

Not around me, they haven’t. They’ve been too busy calling him the gangster of love.

Weird name for cat, I know, but… 🤷🏻‍♂️

Nah, some people just call him that.

Ah! Thank you for the update. In that case, yes, now it comes down to how much is obscured, changed, or removed.

Or he can pocket veto. If Congress is still adjourned the Monday after Thanksgiving, then the bill is dead until such a time that Congress can get it passed through both houses a second time.

Keep in mind, I’m no lawyer; just a guy with decent google-fu who listens when people in my life who are lawyers talk about things like this.

Simply put, yes, this would be defrauding the court, which can be two felonies in one: fraud (definitely applies), and obstruction of justice (might apply).

Like, I’ve found instances of people perjuring themselves to grand juries, and lawyers presenting false information to them, and both of those are crimes. But they both by default can only be done if you present your case to the grand jury, and that’s what failed to happen here!

This may well be the first time it’s ever happened in US legal history, because it’s one of the several things we adopted from England’s legal system immediately after the Revolutionary War. England only abolished grand juries less than a century ago; now all their cases just go to trial.

Is this a serious question?

There’s still a lot of people who think the creation is the monster of the story.

I’ve had this saved on my phone for YEARS.

I like that there’s an official answer for this. Even the Pope is not above needing forgiveness.