I get lawhumpers hate this kind of situation, but they’re part of what got us here.
I get lawhumpers hate this kind of situation, but they’re part of what got us here.
I also think the only “performative” part of any of this is when people feel they have to state “murder is bad” just to signal they aren’t bloodthirsty maniacs.
Bigger question: is the law equipped to deal with a CEO whose decisions kill?
I also think the only “performative” part of any of this is when people feel they have to state “murder is bad” just to signal they aren’t bloodthirsty maniacs.
Bigger question: is the law equipped to deal with a CEO whose decisions kill?