Butters
banner
butters.social
Butters
@butters.social
🇺🇸🏳️‍🌈 31 | He/Him | Computer Engineer, hopefully PhD soon | I run cons

Often NSFW - 18+ Only
Oh no. Is he going to come out in support of the wizard or something?
November 22, 2025 at 7:17 PM
I don’t think blue hair would help you, and there are some places it would hurt. How much do you want to change to maximize your employability?

My place wouldn’t have any problem with it, and we are on the gov services side. You’ll make some soldiers jealous, though😆
October 27, 2025 at 3:55 PM
Hound Solo
October 13, 2025 at 4:59 PM
Which toy is that?
October 8, 2025 at 6:51 PM
Feel better! I get them and can confirm they are the worst.
October 8, 2025 at 5:35 PM
I used to run a completely SFW non-furry account as my main. After years I started a furry account on the side, and it slowly became my main. Now when I moved here I didn't even set up a SFW account. You get all of me or none of me.
September 26, 2025 at 9:52 PM
You've found a great thing, and I appreciate what you do.
September 24, 2025 at 4:16 AM
I don’t know, I think you’re better at not comparing yourself to other people than I am.
September 20, 2025 at 12:59 PM
If you open for commissions maybe next year 😆
September 1, 2025 at 1:53 PM
Same. I would subscribe to art as a service where I just get random commissions every now and then. Deciding what I want and finding an artist who is available is real work and I don’t like doing it XD
August 31, 2025 at 12:03 PM
Double it and give it to the next guy
August 31, 2025 at 4:48 AM
I wonder if there was a policy change or something. I had the same thing happen just waiting for my own order recently. Free drink and taco coupons. It was really nice of them.
August 11, 2025 at 7:42 AM
Sometimes just not much to say.
July 31, 2025 at 6:46 AM
Why does this hurt me so much. No me gut stas.
July 29, 2025 at 5:29 PM
Maybe more formally I think websites should be liable for what they have, guardians should be liable for what children see, and children should be liable for what they ask for.

If websites mislabel what they have then parents should be able to sue them. (I don't think labelling should be mandatory)
July 29, 2025 at 4:56 PM
No one wants to be checking IDs either! We should legislate this into existence, I just think it should be the other way around from what we're getting.
July 29, 2025 at 4:19 PM
I would differentiate between the kid and the user agent (browser) though. If a parent hands their kid a tablet then it's on the parent to configure the browser to know it's in the hands of a child.
July 29, 2025 at 4:17 PM
The current system gives parents basically no tools other than crude filters that have to look at a rendered page or a url and guess at the rating. If the tool is wrong you could maybe go after the tool author, but good luck with that.
July 29, 2025 at 4:16 PM
I don't even think they should be asking if you're 18 though. I don't think websites should have to make blanket judgements about what is appropriate for whom. They should be held to truth in advertising what they have and our user agent can do the rest based on local policy.
July 29, 2025 at 4:14 PM
Restricting your kids' internet to only sites with a Content-Label will severely restrict what they can see, but that's probably a good thing? If it catches on with parents then more sites will adopt it to reach their target market.
July 29, 2025 at 4:05 PM
If parents want to keep their kids from seeing something they should be able to just change a setting, not have to lobby congress.
July 29, 2025 at 4:04 PM