And Google's Deep Dreams, the backbone of modern AI technology, was developed 10 years ago. I've included some example of neural net snapchat lenses. These don't use the face-map morph or add stickers, they re-draw a new "style" using the photo as the target image in a complicated find and replace.

I've gone ahead and highlighted some areas that contain artifacts that are incredibly uncommon for human artists but very frequent in AI generated images. If you have more questions feel free to DM me. Hope this helps!

Hey, since you don't seem to be aware, the block option is here. You click the three dots next to the post options. If you'd really wanted me to stop responding you could have done that ages ago.

I believe these are the most relevent sections

I would rather have sent a DM but you have them closed, so I have to respond here. Hi, I'm from the AI labeler team! I saw your appeal and wanted to provide a bit of context. Your pfp appears to have been made using Photoshop's neural filters - which DO use AI.

www.adobe.com/products/pho...

This is an odd one. It looks like the version of the Arcane screen grab you are using has been modified to make it look smoother or "nicer", which introduced some artifacts that make it resemble AI (the filter used may incorporate AI tech - many do). I can see why a mod may have thought it was.

Hey, just for the sake of complete transparency I've taken the time to 100% offer everything we can to rectify this situation, even though we get literally hundreds of reports a day.

Here is a screenshot of me offering to write a full report (from a post in this thread that was deleted).

The label has already been removed! And, to clarify, it never said the user was an AI or bot, only that his avatar or banner was an AI image. Our label looks like this, and it clearly refers to the profile picture, not the person.

There are a number of indications. For instance, there are areas where it would not make sense for an artist to make those kind of marks, and the colors blur in a way inconsistent with the graphic/gradient style of the image. There is also a "haloing" effect around the black, common to AI images.

There are lots of little details all over, really, mistakes that are uncommon with humans but incredibly common with AI. Like the inconsistencies in this necklace, the warping in this hair, or the way the hair passes over this necklace.

Areas where the artist had to touch up the AI are of notedly different line quality and coloration treatment. It's possible, but unlikely, they got that lazy with the hands compared to less important parts of the image. Earlier works match the hand more

Well, the good news is you have no label on your account (easy to check, you can subscribe and unsubscribe to confirm for yourself), nor are you on our mute list, which you can see in the attached image (I scrolled all the way down to the bottom to make sure. As for the second part, I am not... 1/2

AI mod here! I understand this is frustrating! We talked it over a lot, actually. It's my personal belief that this artist created a loose sketch and ran it through an AI generator. This sort of tech has been around for awhile. Not shown by my co-mod is my mark up, which shows places the sketch 1/2

First subscribe to the AI moderation list if you haven't already. You then click the three dots on a post (other than your own) and then click report post. Select the appropriate mod option (We're the AI one), click the reason for reporting, and add some details to help the mods out.

🙂👍