sunnie
@bubblegum-sunset.bsky.social
votv liker
https://bloodredskies.straw.page/
https://bloodredskies.straw.page/
Reposted by sunnie
Base kurfur will always be a member of my base, seeing him face plant every door and jump around excited is always so fun to have
June 8, 2025 at 2:23 AM
Base kurfur will always be a member of my base, seeing him face plant every door and jump around excited is always so fun to have
Reposted by sunnie
Late night university study session for Kel, sometime before the events of Voices of the Void.
June 7, 2025 at 11:50 PM
Late night university study session for Kel, sometime before the events of Voices of the Void.
Reposted by sunnie
Reposted by sunnie
made @kingsillysmilez.bsky.social's doggo character into a minecraft skin for pride!!!
June 7, 2025 at 11:03 PM
made @kingsillysmilez.bsky.social's doggo character into a minecraft skin for pride!!!
Reposted by sunnie
reminder that referenceangle.com exists.
November 9, 2024 at 11:47 PM
reminder that referenceangle.com exists.
Reposted by sunnie
I'll go one further: any attempt to control pornography is an attempt to outright control the culture. When the government is allowed to define "decency" then anything the government doesn't like can be declared "indecent."
May 9, 2025 at 3:28 PM
I'll go one further: any attempt to control pornography is an attempt to outright control the culture. When the government is allowed to define "decency" then anything the government doesn't like can be declared "indecent."
Reposted by sunnie
Any attempt to control pornography is at its core, an attempt to control women.
May 9, 2025 at 2:45 PM
Any attempt to control pornography is at its core, an attempt to control women.
Reposted by sunnie
i wish it was that simple. this is about control. this is about an excuse to ban anything they don't like and call it porn. i wish this was as simple as a dude lashing out bc he's ashamed he likes porn but this is about flaunting the ability to remove rights from humans under a purity facade
May 9, 2025 at 9:49 PM
i wish it was that simple. this is about control. this is about an excuse to ban anything they don't like and call it porn. i wish this was as simple as a dude lashing out bc he's ashamed he likes porn but this is about flaunting the ability to remove rights from humans under a purity facade
Reposted by sunnie
This will most likely be going before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transport.
I took the liberty of doing up a list of every Senator on the committee plus the phone numbers for their Washington offices. Senators in bold are up re-election next year.
I took the liberty of doing up a list of every Senator on the committee plus the phone numbers for their Washington offices. Senators in bold are up re-election next year.
May 9, 2025 at 9:06 AM
This will most likely be going before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transport.
I took the liberty of doing up a list of every Senator on the committee plus the phone numbers for their Washington offices. Senators in bold are up re-election next year.
I took the liberty of doing up a list of every Senator on the committee plus the phone numbers for their Washington offices. Senators in bold are up re-election next year.
Reposted by sunnie
It's important to remember that when fascists say "phonography" they don't necessarily mean sexually explicit material - they often also mean anything to do with LGBTQ+ people whether it's sexually explicit or not.
May 9, 2025 at 5:36 AM
It's important to remember that when fascists say "phonography" they don't necessarily mean sexually explicit material - they often also mean anything to do with LGBTQ+ people whether it's sexually explicit or not.
Reposted by sunnie
Porn is not a problem the real problem here is parents aren't watching their kids and why should I suffer or be punished for it? And even if it wasn't a kids viewing it problem (which is more or less an excuse they use) i want to support sex workers and artists.
May 9, 2025 at 5:28 AM
Porn is not a problem the real problem here is parents aren't watching their kids and why should I suffer or be punished for it? And even if it wasn't a kids viewing it problem (which is more or less an excuse they use) i want to support sex workers and artists.
Reposted by sunnie
They literally tried to steal lunches from every kid in Maine while simultaneously stealing money from their education all because two trans kids (not two thousand or two hundred. Two.) dared to participate in student athletics programs.
Conservatives do not care about children.
Conservatives do not care about children.
May 9, 2025 at 5:32 PM
They literally tried to steal lunches from every kid in Maine while simultaneously stealing money from their education all because two trans kids (not two thousand or two hundred. Two.) dared to participate in student athletics programs.
Conservatives do not care about children.
Conservatives do not care about children.
Reposted by sunnie
I swear to God, if I see "protecting children" one more time I'm gonna lose my mind.
These people will say they're helping children and yet are opposed to free school lunches, mental healthcare for students, and stricter firearm control. It's just blatent lying and scapegoating.
These people will say they're helping children and yet are opposed to free school lunches, mental healthcare for students, and stricter firearm control. It's just blatent lying and scapegoating.
May 9, 2025 at 3:46 PM
I swear to God, if I see "protecting children" one more time I'm gonna lose my mind.
These people will say they're helping children and yet are opposed to free school lunches, mental healthcare for students, and stricter firearm control. It's just blatent lying and scapegoating.
These people will say they're helping children and yet are opposed to free school lunches, mental healthcare for students, and stricter firearm control. It's just blatent lying and scapegoating.
Reposted by sunnie
The end game is to define people -- trans people, queers -- as pornographers for being in public, arrest and remove them.
May 9, 2025 at 9:38 AM
The end game is to define people -- trans people, queers -- as pornographers for being in public, arrest and remove them.
Reposted by sunnie
And when they finish arresting “peddlers” and librarians they’ll go after people for possession. The right to own a book or movie — dirty or not — that the government declares obscene is fairly new, going back to the late 1960s.
They’ll reverse Stanley v Georgia if we don’t stop them.
They’ll reverse Stanley v Georgia if we don’t stop them.
STANLEY v. GEORGIA
Whether the First Amendment prohibits criminal sanction for private possession of material deemed legally obscene.
www.thefire.org
May 9, 2025 at 2:41 AM
And when they finish arresting “peddlers” and librarians they’ll go after people for possession. The right to own a book or movie — dirty or not — that the government declares obscene is fairly new, going back to the late 1960s.
They’ll reverse Stanley v Georgia if we don’t stop them.
They’ll reverse Stanley v Georgia if we don’t stop them.
Reposted by sunnie
The critical part to remember is this:
These people do not define pornography the way you do: they mean LGBTQ+ representation, they mean sex ed, they mean Netflix, they mean literature, they mean video games, they mean healthcare, they mean political speech.
www.msnbc.com/msnbc/amp/rc...
These people do not define pornography the way you do: they mean LGBTQ+ representation, they mean sex ed, they mean Netflix, they mean literature, they mean video games, they mean healthcare, they mean political speech.
www.msnbc.com/msnbc/amp/rc...
Project 2025’s plan to criminalize porn has a sinister subplot
The far-right game plan for a second Trump term defines pornography to include "transgender ideology."
www.msnbc.com
May 9, 2025 at 2:34 AM
The critical part to remember is this:
These people do not define pornography the way you do: they mean LGBTQ+ representation, they mean sex ed, they mean Netflix, they mean literature, they mean video games, they mean healthcare, they mean political speech.
www.msnbc.com/msnbc/amp/rc...
These people do not define pornography the way you do: they mean LGBTQ+ representation, they mean sex ed, they mean Netflix, they mean literature, they mean video games, they mean healthcare, they mean political speech.
www.msnbc.com/msnbc/amp/rc...
Reposted by sunnie
The same bill was previously introduced (and died) twice in the Dem congress, but, as you're all probably aware, the politics have changed.
I think there's a low chance of *this* actually passing, but it's a sign: they don't respect the rights of adults to get off, even in private.
I think there's a low chance of *this* actually passing, but it's a sign: they don't respect the rights of adults to get off, even in private.
May 8, 2025 at 7:05 PM
The same bill was previously introduced (and died) twice in the Dem congress, but, as you're all probably aware, the politics have changed.
I think there's a low chance of *this* actually passing, but it's a sign: they don't respect the rights of adults to get off, even in private.
I think there's a low chance of *this* actually passing, but it's a sign: they don't respect the rights of adults to get off, even in private.
Reposted by sunnie
The "Interstate Obscenity Definition Act" release cites children, of course, but funnily enough the bill itself also bans it for adults. How odd!
And who could have seen this coming!
www.thenation.com/article/poli...
And who could have seen this coming!
www.thenation.com/article/poli...
Sex Workers Are Trying to Warn Us About Project 2025
A group of performers and activists are giving voters a clear message: Under a Trump administration, not even your porn is safe.
www.thenation.com
May 8, 2025 at 5:35 PM
The "Interstate Obscenity Definition Act" release cites children, of course, but funnily enough the bill itself also bans it for adults. How odd!
And who could have seen this coming!
www.thenation.com/article/poli...
And who could have seen this coming!
www.thenation.com/article/poli...
Reposted by sunnie
KOSA’s “sponsors are claiming—again—that the latest version won’t censor online content. It isn’t true,” EFF’s @jmullin.bsky.social said. “This bill still sets up a censorship regime” that'll “suppress lawful, important speech online, especially for young people.”
Republicans seek to boost AI while tightening grip on social media and online speech
Republicans have introduced measures that increase oversight of social media platforms and online speech, while simultaneously discouraging the regulation of AI.
www.nbcnews.com
May 19, 2025 at 11:15 PM
KOSA’s “sponsors are claiming—again—that the latest version won’t censor online content. It isn’t true,” EFF’s @jmullin.bsky.social said. “This bill still sets up a censorship regime” that'll “suppress lawful, important speech online, especially for young people.”
Reposted by sunnie
Lets battle!!!!!!!!
May 14, 2025 at 11:30 PM
Lets battle!!!!!!!!