Ben Keener
@btkeener.bsky.social
Thank you, @gauthamrao.bsky.social !
November 21, 2025 at 4:01 AM
Thank you, @gauthamrao.bsky.social !
Perhaps of interest to @anthonymkreis.bsky.social @evanbernick.bsky.social @kewhittington.bsky.social
November 20, 2025 at 10:53 PM
Perhaps of interest to @anthonymkreis.bsky.social @evanbernick.bsky.social @kewhittington.bsky.social
Reposted by Ben Keener
... and national security in Hong Kong). Articles are from Jeffrey Goldsworthy (on Dr Bonham's Case); @anuragdeb.bsky.social and @colinmurray.bsky.social (on Art 2 of the Winsor Framework the Legacy Act and the IMA); Lisa Burton Crawford and Janina Boughey (on Automated Information about Law); ...
June 19, 2025 at 12:52 PM
... and national security in Hong Kong). Articles are from Jeffrey Goldsworthy (on Dr Bonham's Case); @anuragdeb.bsky.social and @colinmurray.bsky.social (on Art 2 of the Winsor Framework the Legacy Act and the IMA); Lisa Burton Crawford and Janina Boughey (on Automated Information about Law); ...
My Paper: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Bonham's Case and Judicial Duty
<p>Bonham’s Case is perhaps one of the most famous cases in the common law tradition. It is also one of the most poorly understood. Chief Justice Edward Coke ap
papers.ssrn.com
July 9, 2025 at 12:25 AM
My Paper: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
His Paper: www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/en-gb/produc...
Public Law journal | Sweet & Maxwell
Since 1956, the Public Law journal has been the leading forum for information and debate in the constantly evolving area of law and government.
www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk
July 9, 2025 at 12:25 AM
His Paper: www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/en-gb/produc...
From the Papers of John Marshall, vol. 7. Read more here (3/3) rotunda.upress.virginia.edu/founders/def...
United States v. Peters, Opinion, 20 February 1809
rotunda.upress.virginia.edu
May 4, 2025 at 5:23 PM
From the Papers of John Marshall, vol. 7. Read more here (3/3) rotunda.upress.virginia.edu/founders/def...
"It is sufficient...to remark that the executive of the United States is not only unauthorized to prevent the execution of a decree sanctioned by the Supreme Court of the United States, but is expressly enjoined by statute to carry into effect any such decree..." (2/3)
May 4, 2025 at 5:23 PM
"It is sufficient...to remark that the executive of the United States is not only unauthorized to prevent the execution of a decree sanctioned by the Supreme Court of the United States, but is expressly enjoined by statute to carry into effect any such decree..." (2/3)
My paper: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Calvin's Case and Birthright Citizenship
<p>Calvin’s Case established the birthright rule for English subjects. President Trump’s Executive Order 14160 asserts that the children of illegally present al
papers.ssrn.com
April 28, 2025 at 5:01 PM
My paper: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
If one thus assumes that parental allegiance was necessary to a common law birthright rule, illegally-present aliens would still seem to be able to give birth to birthright subjects. My paper with Penn Law Review: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.... (4/4)
Calvin's Case and Birthright Citizenship
<p>Calvin’s Case established the birthright rule for English subjects. President Trump’s Executive Order 14160 asserts that the children of illegally present al
papers.ssrn.com
April 24, 2025 at 8:10 PM
If one thus assumes that parental allegiance was necessary to a common law birthright rule, illegally-present aliens would still seem to be able to give birth to birthright subjects. My paper with Penn Law Review: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.... (4/4)
And allegiance status in England could really only be changed by the act of a Sovereign monarch or by acts of violence so extreme to rupture a state of presumed peace between nations (thus shifting a nation from "in amity" to "enemy"). (3/4)
April 24, 2025 at 8:10 PM
And allegiance status in England could really only be changed by the act of a Sovereign monarch or by acts of violence so extreme to rupture a state of presumed peace between nations (thus shifting a nation from "in amity" to "enemy"). (3/4)