Assuming this is about locking phones away, and not Apple's new thing, the point isn't that any potential phone harm is removed, but that kids don't twat about with phones during school day. Is this somehow contentious?

That says '4 or more', and the other data established that 4 is probably more common. Which is all beside the original point, that it's quite interesting what people frame as normal/expected. I'd be surprised if many people thought of a normal family home as having 5 bedrooms.

Which makes them unusual, even before you consider HMOs, and the distribution of those which aren't.

It will be my daughter's first ever gig, 40 years and one week after I first saw New Order.

I say the edit was bad - I’ve not seen it an of course descriptions of it aren’t necessarily unbiased.

It doesn’t seem a good sign that part of the reason (per the memo) seems to be spurious balance. The edit was inherently bad, but ‘one supporter against 10’ is not.

I’m similarly ignorant of and uninterested in Coldplay, but I probably have different prejudices about them. (closer to stereophonics et al)

I think this is nuance I’m not getting. FM never meant anything to me, so I didn’t really have an opinion on them other than not liking the big 80s hit.

Still not sure I’ve listened to Rumours. Tried Tusk, but other than title track it didn’t do a lot for me.

I don’t remember any opinions on old music coming from the press (although I was never NME; Smash Hits then MM for me). It was just that it was old music, and therefore for old people (or people who thought old).

The sudden in innumeracy of people finding train seats. (Except on Crosscountry where I’m fairly sure they’re randomised).

Idk, Lloyd’s performance isn’t any worse than Portman’s, and not much worse than McGregor’s

Fucksake. First thing I see is a screenshot spoiling it. Then forgot and looked at front pages on BBC website.