User not found
banner
brokenuser.bsky.social
User not found
@brokenuser.bsky.social
I don't exist. I'm an embodiment of thoughts, ideas, concepts and feelings. I use these to help everyone who deserves it in whatever ways I can.
Anything can be redacted but it needs a written justification as to why, submitted to congress. And she better have a good reason for every redaction individually.
November 19, 2025 at 5:41 PM
If it can cause permanent damage to expose pedophiles and deranged rich folk, then it deserves to recieve the damage rather than protecting the few and keeping the corruption. One bad apple ruins the bunch, rpot them all out at every cost, no matter the damage, start over if you need to.
November 19, 2025 at 5:26 PM
Every redaction better have a good explanation submitted as per the transparency act they just all voted on.
November 19, 2025 at 5:20 PM
Remember when it comes out that if there is more Democrats in the so-called "democrat hoax" then it is very fabricated and there is a lot we are not being told. No, we cannot trust any of them.
November 19, 2025 at 3:48 PM
Part of the bill states that all redactions require justification documented and submitted separately.
November 19, 2025 at 3:41 PM
Part of the bill states "All redactions must be accompanied by a written justification published in the Federal Register and submitted to Congress". There needs to be a record of it and there will always be an original copy they cannot get rid of without facing legal charges bigger than anyone wants
November 19, 2025 at 1:49 PM
He is just screwing himself. Making it a huge deal and likely trying to find a way to stop it without taking direct blame. The backfire is now that if he doesn't sign it then it can go back to congress for a ⅔rd vote to override his veto.
November 19, 2025 at 9:50 AM
And when he doesn't a ⅔rd vote in both senate and house will override his veto. He said to release it, it can still happen. He will only look mpre guilty if he tries to stop it.
November 19, 2025 at 7:34 AM
Counterpoint - only the files that were told to be investigated should be withheld

Trump told DoJ to investigate "high profile Dems" in the files. So, files relating to him should be available unless it's him sucking off clinton. Meaning most Dem pedophiles might end up getting protected, in theory
November 19, 2025 at 7:32 AM
It's about being rich and having a clear separation from the poor with power over them.
November 19, 2025 at 2:27 AM
There was still victims going to the FBI with new information. That changed when Trump's DOJ reviewed the files and closed the case in July this year.
November 19, 2025 at 1:11 AM
The Epstein case was still an open investigation during the entire Biden admin. They had an open grand jury and even after Maxwell's conviction, the case was still on appeal. Anyone in law enforcement knows you don't open your case file when it's still under appeal. 1/2
November 19, 2025 at 1:10 AM
And what exactly happened that Biden could have done? Go ahead, inform me and the rest of the internet about how much you actually don't know.
November 19, 2025 at 1:04 AM
Technically speaking he only requested that the files be investigated ("for high profile Dems"). He never requested that the files including himself be investigated, files including him should be available unless its a matter of national security or unless it's him doing things with clinton.
November 19, 2025 at 1:02 AM
He was attempting to pass blame. So when the files arent fully released because he issued an investivation and the DoJ will keep part hidden. He can say, "See, i tried to release it, it's not my fault these people aren't working with me"
November 19, 2025 at 12:46 AM
The internet? We apparently just need cloudflare and aws-east to go down and the whole world can't do anything online.
November 18, 2025 at 11:42 PM
All good. Saw the question. He didn't get a direct answer, but now that there is an answer, anyone who swipes past will be able to read it.
November 18, 2025 at 11:39 PM
The files were under lock and key with pending investigations during bidens term. The DoJ was wprking on it and biden didnt have the authority to do anything about it. The investigation was cancelled by trump and his posse, so it can be released now. Biden respected the DoJ, trump does what he wants
November 18, 2025 at 11:36 PM
This is a screenshot of a section in the Epstein Transparency Act Bill that was recently voted on in the house.
November 18, 2025 at 10:38 PM
It claims that she can redact it if it is a matter of natuonal security, but she also needs to include a summary. And all redactions need an explanation.
November 18, 2025 at 10:36 PM
Make it so that congress gets paid minimum wage for the state they represent, but if they help imprison a billionaire then they get a bonus paid by the billionaire and any other illegally gained money the billionaire had get pushed towards taxes and national debt. Just a thought, not thought through
November 18, 2025 at 7:44 PM
Remember, when it releases it was a "democrat hoax", so when it has only democrats and no trump, be hella suspicious and know that this current government is not working for the people, only for themselves.
November 18, 2025 at 7:14 PM
He likely will. He does whatever trump tells him to. Trump said release them, that is his job. Pandering to the will of the rich sycophant, fuck the people.
November 18, 2025 at 7:10 PM
Thought this was the case since the files were first mentioned. He has heavily defended against the release since Epstein died.
November 18, 2025 at 4:26 PM