Anything can be redacted but it needs a written justification as to why, submitted to congress. And she better have a good reason for every redaction individually.

Every redaction better have a good explanation submitted as per the transparency act they just all voted on.

Part of the bill states that all redactions require justification documented and submitted separately.

Part of the bill states "All redactions must be accompanied by a written justification published in the Federal Register and submitted to Congress". There needs to be a record of it and there will always be an original copy they cannot get rid of without facing legal charges bigger than anyone wants

It claims that she can redact it if it is a matter of natuonal security, but she also needs to include a summary. And all redactions need an explanation.

Grijalva? Who is that? I never knew she got elected. Why don't they tell me these things? I guess. If she gets her votes confirmed (again), i will swear her in whenever i'm available.

[Quick guys, shut it all down again, lose count 80 times, rig the vote so she didnt win or something]

*satire*

Can't ask him about it, he won't know anything.

Pennsylvania too

Who broke youtube?

We should do something like this.

We should do this.

Quite Literally on their FACT sheet they shared with the announcement they made.
www.hhs.gov/press-room/a...