And David Robbe

Now @dlbarack.bsky.social in this next session with his more theoretical perspective on foraging from food to inquiry.

Read more about the story behind the project here - communities.springernature.com/posts/boosti...

Thanks to all the co-authors across @sdnl.bsky.social, @msnlab.bsky.social, @thechbh.bsky.social, @uob-sop.bsky.social, @scanunit.bsky.social & others

Finally, we found that people who believe climate change is man-made and support policies to protect the planet had higher pro-environmental motivation specifically.

People lower in trait apathy and who rated the task as less effortful were more likely to help both causes.

Using computational modelling, we showed that these effective interventions changed how rewards 💰 for the climate 🌍 (vs. food charity) were devalued by effort 💪.

This was independent of how noisy participants' choices were 🤔

Two interventions robustly decreased the preference to help food over climate, across measures and analyses.

These interventions:
- decreased psychological distance to the negative effects of climate change
- used system justification theory to promote pro-environmental action

We tested the 11 expert-sourced interventions from the International Climate Psychology Collaboration led by
@madalina.bsky.social,
@kimdoell.bsky.social, @jbakcoleman.bsky.social & @jayvanbavel.bsky.social

See doi.org/10.1126/scia... & doi.org/10.1038/s415... (all the data are freely available!)

People were more willing to exert effort when:

💪 the effort required was 🔽
💰 the reward available was 🔼

In the control group without intervention, motivation was higher to provide food than mitigate climate change 🌍

➡️ Interventions that promote climate motivation are key

3,055 ppts from 6 countries 🇧🇬🇬🇷🇳🇬🇸🇪🇬🇧🇺🇸 did our new online Pro-Environmental Effort Task ✨ the PEET ✨

On each trial, they choose between rest or work: exerting effort by clicking boxes to earn more credits 💪

Credits were donations to a climate charity 🌍 or a matched control food charity

Our second keynote now from @benhayden.bsky.social

Last in this session @tobywise.bsky.social talking about computational ethology in humans.

Now Dario Campagner on the Aeon project.

The afternoon begins with Jennifer Li from the Max Plank on brain-wide dynamics of foraging.

Next up @alexschakowski.bsky.social talking about social foraging.

Now for some modelling. @markdhumphries.bsky.social presenting work from @emmavscholey.bsky.social on stochastic choice in patch foraging.

Now Hannah Haberkern on navigational strategies for foraging in ants and flies.

The awesome @emmavscholey.bsky.social then presented work from her PhD on effortful prey-selection in humans. And her rubbish supervisor forgot to take a photo!

We will get you to Birmingham one day Hugo!

Next Megan Jackson from Uni. Of Bristol.