Bun 🐇 🇫🇷 🇨🇭
bookishbunbun.bsky.social
Bun 🐇 🇫🇷 🇨🇭
@bookishbunbun.bsky.social
Introvert. Cat lady. AuDHD.
Your communication has been clear. You’re using the same logic used throughout history to justify harming whole groups: one person hurt me, so the whole group is a threat. You literally described race-driven violence. We’re all wounded. That doesn’t give anyone permission to turn pain into cruelty.
November 20, 2025 at 3:38 PM
When you list “harmed by a person of color” as a reason to sympathize with ICE violence, you’re linking race with danger. That’s a racialized frame. You not meaning to be racist does not mean you were not racist. Again: do better.

Or just keep being racist. Your choice. 🤷‍♀️
November 18, 2025 at 4:46 PM
No ‘yes’ to any of those justifies any of this. The answer to someone’s trauma or economic need is NEVER to go commit violence against anyone else. And your last question only exposes your racism. Do better.
November 17, 2025 at 5:09 PM
Same. They already exposed who they were.
November 2, 2025 at 8:24 PM
Reposted by Bun 🐇 🇫🇷 🇨🇭
November 1, 2025 at 8:13 PM
Reposted by Bun 🐇 🇫🇷 🇨🇭
The question that any journalist in the White House press corps worth their salt should be asking is, "Has the president received any medical care other than his annual physical since he was sworn into office?"
August 23, 2025 at 1:39 AM
The entire investigative process inherently involves systematically listing and identifying suspects and their actions. The alternative is that the FBI has been sitting on the evidence with no investigation or suppressing the evidence. Which means they not doing their jobs. Or someone is lying.
August 3, 2025 at 8:30 AM
Right, he’s focused on arguing semantics instead of being focused on accountability. It’s not a hypothetical list. It’s like saying I don’t have a grocery list because that’s not what I call it. Do you think they’re reviewing evidence and not compiling lists of data?
August 3, 2025 at 8:20 AM
It’s actively complicit. With his reach, he’s lending credibility to the DOJ and FBI when they say there’s “no list” when the entire point of their investigations for years has been to figure out who the bad guys are and what they did. No doubt he knows they have a list… writing crime fic and all.
August 3, 2025 at 5:47 AM
Yes, people need to be more specific. We want the list the FBI compiled over the years they’ve had with evidence that details the clients (criminals) who need to be brought to justice. Who thinks Epstein had a client list neatly typed out for the FBI to discover?
August 3, 2025 at 5:05 AM
Whose job was it to compile the list?
August 3, 2025 at 1:16 AM
And I may be wrong, but I thought it was 1000+ victims. That’s a lot of people who deserved answers well before now.
August 3, 2025 at 1:15 AM
It’s a really interesting way to say “The agents at the FBI didn’t do their jobs.” After all, it’s their job to review the evidence and come up with the data on who the criminals were. “There is no list” = we are lying because it wasn’t Epstein’s job (as the criminal) to leave one.
August 3, 2025 at 1:14 AM
Reposted by Bun 🐇 🇫🇷 🇨🇭
Being indoctrinated through your choice of media consumption because it feeds your biases is a hell if a drug.

People being dragged away by ICE and saying “but I voted for Trump” says it all
July 9, 2025 at 11:26 PM