Bo
@bocentric.bsky.social
The enemy of my enemy is a RIOT at dinner parties.
I'm a 6-time published playwright, produced all over the US as well as Canada and the UK. Also a voice talent heard by a few million people... and I can lose a game of chess faster than anyone.
I'm a 6-time published playwright, produced all over the US as well as Canada and the UK. Also a voice talent heard by a few million people... and I can lose a game of chess faster than anyone.
No, no, people don't understand, Garland is right on schedule, he's moving as fast as is humanly possible and all will be well. 🙄
January 8, 2025 at 3:45 AM
No, no, people don't understand, Garland is right on schedule, he's moving as fast as is humanly possible and all will be well. 🙄
You've spent years scolding anyone who suggested Garland must act/act faster/act with more bravery.
Now that time is running out, the same sorts of "grow a pair" pleas are suddenly okay?
With two minutes left in the game, maybe we SHOULD try the forward pass??
Now that time is running out, the same sorts of "grow a pair" pleas are suddenly okay?
With two minutes left in the game, maybe we SHOULD try the forward pass??
January 8, 2025 at 3:35 AM
You've spent years scolding anyone who suggested Garland must act/act faster/act with more bravery.
Now that time is running out, the same sorts of "grow a pair" pleas are suddenly okay?
With two minutes left in the game, maybe we SHOULD try the forward pass??
Now that time is running out, the same sorts of "grow a pair" pleas are suddenly okay?
With two minutes left in the game, maybe we SHOULD try the forward pass??
My sense is that if you graphed both sides, there would be a much larger spike representing "dangerously crazy" on the Maga graph.... but that "frames issue with deceptive language ensuring maximum engagement/clicks" would look similar on both. 😔
January 2, 2025 at 3:09 PM
My sense is that if you graphed both sides, there would be a much larger spike representing "dangerously crazy" on the Maga graph.... but that "frames issue with deceptive language ensuring maximum engagement/clicks" would look similar on both. 😔
Reminds me of the old Soviet joke: "That's when the plumber is coming."
December 30, 2024 at 4:37 AM
Reminds me of the old Soviet joke: "That's when the plumber is coming."
Thank you! I'm very pleased you liked it.
December 18, 2024 at 2:42 PM
Thank you! I'm very pleased you liked it.
December 16, 2024 at 2:43 PM
Formula:
05. Headline <latest Trump idiocy>
10. Sub-head: "This may result in <thing it will never result in>"
15. Goto 05
05. Headline <latest Trump idiocy>
10. Sub-head: "This may result in <thing it will never result in>"
15. Goto 05
December 13, 2024 at 3:32 PM
Formula:
05. Headline <latest Trump idiocy>
10. Sub-head: "This may result in <thing it will never result in>"
15. Goto 05
05. Headline <latest Trump idiocy>
10. Sub-head: "This may result in <thing it will never result in>"
15. Goto 05
"And just like that, he had a new thing he wanted to be called just once before he died."
December 7, 2024 at 10:31 PM
"And just like that, he had a new thing he wanted to be called just once before he died."
I don't even obey in retrospect.
November 27, 2024 at 8:27 PM
I don't even obey in retrospect.
We don't differ on the threat of that. But when I look at your posts, I don't see lots of "TRUMP IS DISMANTLING DEMOCRACY!!!" Perhaps this is because you don't imagine it would help?
I am against Trump.
I am against Trump's people.
And I'm against screaming "IT'S OVER WE BLEW IT WE'RE DOOMED!"
I am against Trump.
I am against Trump's people.
And I'm against screaming "IT'S OVER WE BLEW IT WE'RE DOOMED!"
November 26, 2024 at 10:10 PM
We don't differ on the threat of that. But when I look at your posts, I don't see lots of "TRUMP IS DISMANTLING DEMOCRACY!!!" Perhaps this is because you don't imagine it would help?
I am against Trump.
I am against Trump's people.
And I'm against screaming "IT'S OVER WE BLEW IT WE'RE DOOMED!"
I am against Trump.
I am against Trump's people.
And I'm against screaming "IT'S OVER WE BLEW IT WE'RE DOOMED!"
Strong move. Laughed out loud.
(Wanna get out of jury duty? Use this but change it to "I can tell if someone is guilty just by looking at them.")
(Wanna get out of jury duty? Use this but change it to "I can tell if someone is guilty just by looking at them.")
November 26, 2024 at 6:17 PM
Strong move. Laughed out loud.
(Wanna get out of jury duty? Use this but change it to "I can tell if someone is guilty just by looking at them.")
(Wanna get out of jury duty? Use this but change it to "I can tell if someone is guilty just by looking at them.")
Due respect, how is this "swinging"? This is my essential question for her recent doom-crying: what's the utility? At WHAT is she swinging? How can it be hit? What happens if it's hit? I'd help her swing if I understood the strategic goal, or even if I understood the TACTICAL goal.
November 26, 2024 at 5:57 PM
Due respect, how is this "swinging"? This is my essential question for her recent doom-crying: what's the utility? At WHAT is she swinging? How can it be hit? What happens if it's hit? I'd help her swing if I understood the strategic goal, or even if I understood the TACTICAL goal.
Thank you for the laugh 😊
November 26, 2024 at 4:29 AM
Thank you for the laugh 😊
"The house is on fire!" is a sensible alarm; "The house burned down!" is not a proclamation that benefits anyone--what action are you calling for? Is there any utility to this?
November 25, 2024 at 7:46 PM
"The house is on fire!" is a sensible alarm; "The house burned down!" is not a proclamation that benefits anyone--what action are you calling for? Is there any utility to this?
Thank you. So: If he can't create official government departments, then my next question would be whether he can, by executive action, create the kinds of "Czar" positions that have arisen occasionally in the last 30 years, and by the same order grant them indirect power and/or influence? 
November 25, 2024 at 7:24 PM
Thank you. So: If he can't create official government departments, then my next question would be whether he can, by executive action, create the kinds of "Czar" positions that have arisen occasionally in the last 30 years, and by the same order grant them indirect power and/or influence?