Get a bike! The area around the conference center is very bike-friendly (I wouldn't say that's generally true everywhere in the city)
bsky.app/profile/blaz...

Seems like we are not at (or slightly above) saturation on the left picture?

update

Finally, coming back to the evolution and the journey of ice crystals. We can tear that apart with the help of the "time after convection tracer". Caveat: Can we do something similar with observations? Such analysis will become even more useful at that point [I don't have a good answer to this one]

We can tear the origins apart. The model produces lots of situ cirrus, but they are very thin, contributing only a little to the total TOA energy budget.

But the novelty here is the use of passive tracers to get to:
1. anvil cloud "age"
2. distinguish between convective-origin (anvils) and in situ origin cirrus (formed by ice nucleation on gravity waves)

But only proper input, particularly updrafts in combination with humidity, can lead to reasonable cloud properties. If you are interested in thin cirrus, you may need to go to well beyond km scales to get that right. For fresh anvils, however, 1-4 km may be sufficient (not shown here).

We achieved that in 3 steps that basically don't add up any additional cost to the model. All just quick fixes, not super novel, but simple to implement so you may want to do something similar (or better?)!

We are happy with the updated SAM-P3ice cloud-resolving model's ability to simulate tropical cirrus (both convective and non-convective = in situ origin)

Here the teaser movie...see later more for explanation