There’s language on this in NYT v. Sullivan, too, I believe.

But what Bantam said is that 1A covers booksellers. It gets heightened scrutiny from simply commercial speech.

Neither BB or TT directly engages in the speech, but their actions get higher protection.

That’s closer to commercial speech, but Bantam Books would probably say that’s 1A protected.

Marketplace of ideas would exist and opportunity open new sources.

There are some restrictions such as in radio ownership, but that’s because radio waves are limited.

Otherwise, Schenck and Abrams would have gone the other way.

Basic 1A stuff.

Like there’s so many more pressing concerns about Trump lol.

He can’t and won’t be pardoned.

It’s a state of local charge.

I thought that’s what the first decision would be, too.

It’s still early for decisions by recent SCOTUS standards.

Oh wow. That’s cool!

Go Wes!

This isn’t his judicial hero. He probably can’t name an opinion written by Scalia lol.

There was a potential 3A case with secret service over the summer.

Don’t think it would qualify, but funny people even discussed it.