Bethany Berger
@bethanyberger.bsky.social
Law Prof writing & teaching about Property, American Indian Law & Legal History at Iowa Law.
All statements & opinions are my own and not those of the University of Iowa.
All statements & opinions are my own and not those of the University of Iowa.
Reposted by Bethany Berger
Promises made, promises delivered! www.whitehouse.gov/presidential...
September 17, 2025 at 10:36 PM
Promises made, promises delivered! www.whitehouse.gov/presidential...
Reposted by Bethany Berger
As grim as this story may be, there's still much to be inspired by.
Look no further than this attorney for the children, who rushed to the airport to stop the planes. She stood near the tarmac, warning any officials she saw that they’d be complicit in violating a court order if the planes took off.
Look no further than this attorney for the children, who rushed to the airport to stop the planes. She stood near the tarmac, warning any officials she saw that they’d be complicit in violating a court order if the planes took off.
September 10, 2025 at 3:51 PM
As grim as this story may be, there's still much to be inspired by.
Look no further than this attorney for the children, who rushed to the airport to stop the planes. She stood near the tarmac, warning any officials she saw that they’d be complicit in violating a court order if the planes took off.
Look no further than this attorney for the children, who rushed to the airport to stop the planes. She stood near the tarmac, warning any officials she saw that they’d be complicit in violating a court order if the planes took off.
I am dismayed that Prof. Lash is casting our deletion of previous criticisms as withdrawing them bc we decided they were wrong. That is not the case & it is deceptive to say so.
August 29, 2025 at 5:03 PM
I am dismayed that Prof. Lash is casting our deletion of previous criticisms as withdrawing them bc we decided they were wrong. That is not the case & it is deceptive to say so.
Reposted by Bethany Berger
3/ "A member of the public, appreciating that the Maxwell grand jury materials do not contribute anything to public knowledge, might conclude that the Government’s motion for their unsealing was aimed not at 'transparency' but at diversion—aimed not at full disclosure but at the illusion of such."
August 11, 2025 at 2:54 PM
3/ "A member of the public, appreciating that the Maxwell grand jury materials do not contribute anything to public knowledge, might conclude that the Government’s motion for their unsealing was aimed not at 'transparency' but at diversion—aimed not at full disclosure but at the illusion of such."