Benjamin Henke
@benhenke.bsky.social
Philosopher of Cognitive Science and AI. @imperialcollegeldn.bsky.social, @cfi-cambridge.bsky.social, and the Institute of Philosophy
Associate Director @laihp.bsky.social
While my opinions are my own, they’re also my gift to all of you.
Associate Director @laihp.bsky.social
While my opinions are my own, they’re also my gift to all of you.
1. It was the nightingale, and not the lark,
that pierced the fearful hollow of thine ear.
2. It was the nightingale, and not the lark,
that pierced the fearful hollow of thine ear.
that pierced the fearful hollow of thine ear.
2. It was the nightingale, and not the lark,
that pierced the fearful hollow of thine ear.
August 28, 2025 at 4:18 PM
1. It was the nightingale, and not the lark,
that pierced the fearful hollow of thine ear.
2. It was the nightingale, and not the lark,
that pierced the fearful hollow of thine ear.
that pierced the fearful hollow of thine ear.
2. It was the nightingale, and not the lark,
that pierced the fearful hollow of thine ear.
‘Gal’ comes to mind. I mostly wish it didn’t.
April 22, 2025 at 11:32 AM
‘Gal’ comes to mind. I mostly wish it didn’t.
I know you’re wrong, but I’m just having no trouble articulating why.
February 12, 2025 at 1:16 PM
I know you’re wrong, but I’m just having no trouble articulating why.
FYI, I just got followed by this account: bsky.app/profile/laur...
bsky.app
February 1, 2025 at 12:14 PM
FYI, I just got followed by this account: bsky.app/profile/laur...
This isn't an answer to your question, but a strong relationship between desireableness and credence would make sense if we adopt an RL view of desireableness. A surprising positive result is more reinforcing than an unsurprising one.
January 28, 2025 at 1:09 AM
This isn't an answer to your question, but a strong relationship between desireableness and credence would make sense if we adopt an RL view of desireableness. A surprising positive result is more reinforcing than an unsurprising one.