Bemused Ⓥ
LightNews LightNews
bemusing.bsky.social
Bemused Ⓥ
@bemusing.bsky.social
95 followers 200 following 17 posts
No drama, just here to stay up-to-date with the news and share things I Iike. Keen on veganism, chess, riding bikes and playing guitar. Bemused but still curious.
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by Bemused Ⓥ
goodlawproject.org
Oooft. Sandie Peggie shared highly offensive messages and was then "untruthful" in giving evidence to the Tribunal.

This is the 'hero' Gender Critical campaigners have chosen.
631. The third aspect was her evidence given when recalled in relation to a message she had passed on to her group of friends which related to floods in Pakistan in the most highly offensive terms. She initially described the messages as “dark humour”. Her evidence later was that the message had been sent to provoke a reaction, in broad summary. We did not consider that latter evidence to be credible given the content of the message sent and her initial evidence about it. In our view it was an untruthful attempt to downplay what she had done, which she recognised as having included very offensive material. We consider that it was clear beyond serious argument that the author or authors of the original message considered the remarks humorous, and that the claimant had also considered them humorous which was why she had passed them on. That was supported in our view by her reference to dark humour
December 8, 2025 at 2:34 PM