Beatriz Urda
@beatrizurda.bsky.social
PhDing at Barcelona Supercomputing Center | Exploring disease co-occurrences through omics, bioinformatics & HPC — with an eye on AI bias, and occasionally covered in clay.
Reposted by Beatriz Urda
📄Ver publicación del primer estudio de comorbilidades en PNAS: pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
🔘Plataforma interactiva de red de conexiones entre enfermedades: disease-perception.bsc.es/rgenexcom/
@beatrizurda.bsky.social @alfonsovalencia.bsky.social
#DíaMundialCáncerMama #19Octubre
🔘Plataforma interactiva de red de conexiones entre enfermedades: disease-perception.bsc.es/rgenexcom/
@beatrizurda.bsky.social @alfonsovalencia.bsky.social
#DíaMundialCáncerMama #19Octubre
October 17, 2025 at 9:02 AM
📄Ver publicación del primer estudio de comorbilidades en PNAS: pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
🔘Plataforma interactiva de red de conexiones entre enfermedades: disease-perception.bsc.es/rgenexcom/
@beatrizurda.bsky.social @alfonsovalencia.bsky.social
#DíaMundialCáncerMama #19Octubre
🔘Plataforma interactiva de red de conexiones entre enfermedades: disease-perception.bsc.es/rgenexcom/
@beatrizurda.bsky.social @alfonsovalencia.bsky.social
#DíaMundialCáncerMama #19Octubre
September 8, 2025 at 4:32 PM
Thank you, Luís!!
September 4, 2025 at 8:08 AM
Thank you, Luís!!
This was devastating.
September 3, 2025 at 4:24 PM
This was devastating.
Reposted by Beatriz Urda
Totally! In our case it wasn’t even about sample size, but a basic textbook statistical concept 🤖. We even increased the sample size to show the results still held under the reviewer’s definition—and still, they wouldn’t budge.
September 3, 2025 at 4:17 PM
Totally! In our case it wasn’t even about sample size, but a basic textbook statistical concept 🤖. We even increased the sample size to show the results still held under the reviewer’s definition—and still, they wouldn’t budge.
Totally! In our case it wasn’t even about sample size, but a basic textbook statistical concept 🤖. We even increased the sample size to show the results still held under the reviewer’s definition—and still, they wouldn’t budge.
September 3, 2025 at 4:17 PM
Totally! In our case it wasn’t even about sample size, but a basic textbook statistical concept 🤖. We even increased the sample size to show the results still held under the reviewer’s definition—and still, they wouldn’t budge.
Muchas gracias por compartir!
September 2, 2025 at 8:16 PM
Muchas gracias por compartir!
12/ This was the road.
👉 Here is the science: bsky.app/profile/beat...
📄 Paper: doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2421060122
👉 Here is the science: bsky.app/profile/beat...
📄 Paper: doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2421060122
September 2, 2025 at 6:37 PM
12/ This was the road.
👉 Here is the science: bsky.app/profile/beat...
📄 Paper: doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2421060122
👉 Here is the science: bsky.app/profile/beat...
📄 Paper: doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2421060122
11/ Endless thanks to those who supported, listened, laughed, and advised: my colleagues, Davide Cirillo, and especially @alfonsovalencia.bsky.social, for his unwavering support throughout this wild journey. @bsc-cns.bsky.social
September 2, 2025 at 6:37 PM
11/ Endless thanks to those who supported, listened, laughed, and advised: my colleagues, Davide Cirillo, and especially @alfonsovalencia.bsky.social, for his unwavering support throughout this wild journey. @bsc-cns.bsky.social
10/ And yes– I am officially fluent in rebuttals 🥋 It even helped me win Best Talk at ISMB/ECCB 2025 NetBio– for the science, the presentation, and (yes) the Q&A. #ISMBECCB2025
September 2, 2025 at 6:37 PM
10/ And yes– I am officially fluent in rebuttals 🥋 It even helped me win Best Talk at ISMB/ECCB 2025 NetBio– for the science, the presentation, and (yes) the Q&A. #ISMBECCB2025