Ben Vezina
banner
bananabenana.bsky.social
Ben Vezina
@bananabenana.bsky.social
Computational Biology | Microbiology | Molecular Biology postdoc.

Right now I do lots of stats, vis, metabolic modelling and quantitative genomics

can we pls fix greenhouse emissions, gov, pls
Reposted by Ben Vezina
We strive to credit labs collecting specimens and generating sequence data prominently. But credit for data contributions is not zero sum – surfacing of data in popular tools generates visibility and does not infringe on future publications by the data generators. 2/5
November 6, 2025 at 9:46 PM
IMO, the strategy should be to get a priority list of the most-used NCBI tools and functionalities, then copy these for ENA and Europe PMC. This feels time-sensitive, as the potential loss of NCBI would set science back. We should be proactive about this, not reactive.
November 5, 2025 at 11:54 PM
This is a fraction of the incredible resources offered exclusively by NCBI. #INSDC is 10/10 but the auxiliary toolsets need development. NCBI isn’t perfect, but their tooling and browser experience is 1st class, offering unparalleled user experience for beginners to domain experts.
November 5, 2025 at 11:54 PM
Independent functionalities/tools like:
- sra-tools
- NCBI Datasets
- Taxdump
- batch entrez
- RefSeq
- Pathogen Isolate Browser and AMRFinderPlus
- PubChem
- While Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI) is a best-in-class tool, much of its content is mirrored from PubMed
November 5, 2025 at 11:54 PM
💯 great point

I should have mentioned that privileged individuals + universities can (should) be financially supporting these open source projects. It's still a much better deal.
October 29, 2025 at 3:21 AM
Some free options for university finance teams to consider:

- Zotero > Endnote (superior performance too)
- Inkscape + NIH BioArt/bioicons > Illustrator + BioRender
- SerialCloner/ApE > SnapGene
- LibreOffice > Microsoft suite
- OpenAlex > Web of Science analytics
October 29, 2025 at 2:57 AM
Reposted by Ben Vezina
Research also shows that spreading smaller amounts of funding out over more researchers generally delivers better scientific outcomes per dollar spent than focusing bigger grants on fewer researchers.

journals.plos.org/plosone/arti...
Big Science vs. Little Science: How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding
Agencies that fund scientific research must choose: is it more effective to give large grants to a few elite researchers, or small grants to many researchers? Large grants would be more effective only...
journals.plos.org
October 4, 2025 at 5:50 PM
Reposted by Ben Vezina
And as for writing, don't get me started. Most often, the process of writing is not a laborious business of transcription, but a process of thinking itself. I'm not about to outsource my thinking to a machine.
September 26, 2025 at 10:50 AM
Reposted by Ben Vezina
Celia also wrote about how we fitted 4.5 billion years in one image, at scale.

chezvoila.com/blog/saguenay/
A data scale tested by time - Voilà:
Most of the time, the choice of scale is based on the data. Or not when the data you want to visualize are 4.5 billion years!
chezvoila.com
September 25, 2025 at 9:40 PM