While intended for child safety, we think this law poses broader challenges & creates significant barriers that limit free speech & harm smaller platforms like ours.
⏩ Find it here: fpf.org/wp-content/u...
⏩ Find it here: fpf.org/wp-content/u...
[tl;dr: it seems unlikely the entire law will be enjoined at this stage]
[tl;dr: it seems unlikely the entire law will be enjoined at this stage]
Find it here:
fpf.org/resource/uno...
Find it here:
fpf.org/resource/uno...
www.ftc.gov/news-events/...
www.ftc.gov/news-events/...
www.freespeechcoalition.com/blog/tenness...
www.freespeechcoalition.com/blog/tenness...
"We are very optimistic that if it's not done this year, that we can do that early next year with our Republican majorities because it's the Republican party that has been working aggressively to protect children online."
"We are very optimistic that if it's not done this year, that we can do that early next year with our Republican majorities because it's the Republican party that has been working aggressively to protect children online."
Read it here: www.linkedin.com/posts/jordan...
Tl;dr: the biggest change is the duty of care got some additional “reasonable person” type language, a new type of harm, and a new disclaimer that it can’t be used to violate 1A.
Read my LinkedIn post for more!
Tl;dr: the biggest change is the duty of care got some additional “reasonable person” type language, a new type of harm, and a new disclaimer that it can’t be used to violate 1A.
Read my LinkedIn post for more!