Imagine Having the Audacity
Imagine Having the Audacity
@audacityesq.bsky.social
No legal advice. All information parroted from only the best podcasts. Please disclose all corn allergies. “Feckless nerd.”
I’ve seen posts about Dems not doing enough all fucking month.

You know which congressmembers I *don’t* see getting called out nearly as much?
February 19, 2025 at 5:26 AM
Alright, this *is* stupid.

But man, there’s an entire other party responsible for what’s going on right now—that deserves a lot more shit than Jeffries.
February 19, 2025 at 5:14 AM
Crazy how all the same clowns who usually whine about the deficit don’t have shit to say about this, but they were loud as hell about student loan forgiveness.
February 15, 2025 at 5:28 AM
They may not for a while, as true damage to economy will lag his implementation of policies—and he’ll just blame Joe Biden for everything.

By the time some of these folks realize they’ve been scammed, who knows how far along this will be.
February 15, 2025 at 5:23 AM
This won’t be an honest case—but just enough to prevent anyone else from lawfully pursuing it a second time, after he’s done sabotaging it.
February 15, 2025 at 5:10 AM
Time for the okey-doke.

“Welp folks, I really tried to get that money back but DoJ just had too good of a case.” 😖

“Also btw, res judicata—so no one else will have a second crack at the bat, after we make our bullshit effort, or I sandbag our AGs case, or whatever corrupt shit I do.”
February 15, 2025 at 5:07 AM
Exactly! CBS paid him—for what? Owner of WaPo is slobbering over him—for what? Politico? LAT? Many have other glaring conflicts of interest, but holy shit—it is NOT a privilege to drink from the dirty ass trough, no matter how many others are doing it too.
February 15, 2025 at 5:01 AM
THANK YOU.

But oh noes, what if we can’t ask Karoline Leavitt to waste our time with useless bullshit answers? What a fucking tragedy. Who cares?! If every legit org told Admin to take a hike, it’d be on ADMIN to earn back its legitimacy. Instead we get this huffing and hawing over being there.
February 15, 2025 at 4:46 AM
…When what we need are agencies that *scrutinize* the Admin. I’d sooner trust (and pay to read) one that told Trump to go pound sand, instead of literally *giving him millions of dollars* or editing articles for overtly flattering profiles, just to be in his presence.
February 15, 2025 at 4:37 AM
I’m not gonna claim to be the premiere lawyer on BlueSky—but in questioning an opponent, one thing to watch for is not to toss so many softballs that they’ll nail out of the park nonstop with self-serving bullshit answers. Too many agencies approach this stuff like it’s a privilege to be bullshat…
February 15, 2025 at 4:37 AM
Exactly. If anything, I’d sooner trust an agency whose credentials have been terminated by this administration, than an agency that paid him millions of dollars, just to be his stooge.
February 15, 2025 at 2:42 AM
You’re still left w/ prosecutor unwilling to prosecute, for a State that doesn’t want them to do it either.

Even if the judge refuses to accept MoD, they can’t force the DoJ to *follow through with* presenting case. Maybe force them to explain it on record. But that’s it, AFAIK.
February 14, 2025 at 9:03 PM
Soft, fuzzy tennis ball questions.
February 13, 2025 at 10:08 PM
“Some people say”
February 11, 2025 at 11:20 PM
If the President wants to wear a cap in the Oval Office, what are you gonna do?
February 11, 2025 at 10:51 PM
“What’s the harm?”

“Sir, your blood has a distinct Louisiana French flavor”
February 8, 2025 at 1:02 AM
Reposted by Imagine Having the Audacity
Credit where due: I believe @brianbeutler.bsky.social was the first to argue that Dems must deny Trump/GOP any votes on anything until the criminality stops:
www.offmessage.net/p/dont-prop-...
Don't Prop Up The Corrupt Trump Regime
The moral hazard of median-voter pandering and limp Democratic resistance.
www.offmessage.net
February 7, 2025 at 10:50 PM