https://sites.google.com/site/ataatay
In many OR problems (queueing, mcst, ...), it is not clear how to build a TU game for sharing costs/benefits. We take a more general view. It allows us to relate opt/pes approaches to core/anti-core without studying each problem separately.
Open access: tinyurl.com/ATEJOR
In many OR problems (queueing, mcst, ...), it is not clear how to build a TU game for sharing costs/benefits. We take a more general view. It allows us to relate opt/pes approaches to core/anti-core without studying each problem separately.
Open access: tinyurl.com/ATEJOR
Pessimist: the cup is half empty
C. Trudeau & I: is about who drank first and whether they made the cup bigger or smaller for the others. Here is an umbrella model — no need to check for each application (mcst, queueing, etc.)
Updated WP: arxiv.org/abs/2403.014...
Pessimist: the cup is half empty
C. Trudeau & I: is about who drank first and whether they made the cup bigger or smaller for the others. Here is an umbrella model — no need to check for each application (mcst, queueing, etc.)
Updated WP: arxiv.org/abs/2403.014...
When agents are farsighted, the singleton set of TTC matching turns out to be farsightedly stable on top of Pareto efficiency. It is enough for agents to anticipate just three steps ahead. Meanwhile, DA and also Boston may not belong to any farsighted stable set. tinyurl.com/GEBFSS
When agents are farsighted, the singleton set of TTC matching turns out to be farsightedly stable on top of Pareto efficiency. It is enough for agents to anticipate just three steps ahead. Meanwhile, DA and also Boston may not belong to any farsighted stable set. tinyurl.com/GEBFSS