Happy FAR form submission day to all who celebrate!

(Not me--I started but won't be finishing mine. Inquire inside for details.)

Does Trump v. CASA preserve the Supreme Court's ability to issue universal injunctions? Is that what Kavanaugh is saying here? Under majority op., I'm not sure SCOTUS affirmation of a lower-court (plaintiff-limited) injunction affords any relief to nonparties, even considering collateral estoppel.

I love this "will he or won't he?" game I'm playing with myself. 🫠

Typo alert!

This is an excellent use of the word "nifty." www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...

A fun aspect of my job is working with foundational documents in constitutional development as they make their way into Gillman, @mgraber1.bsky.social, and @kewhittington.bsky.social's Complete American Constitutionalism series.

Today: The House's Trial Memo from the Clinton Impeachment. Quaint!

I’ll be at Notre Dame Law School next week for this fun symposium!

1:04:40 at the Houston Half Marathon this morning. Not my best but not my worst!

Not yet ready for public viewing but it should be there soon!

This quote from Seila Law is so odd in light of (1) the electoral college; and, now, (2) Trump v. US.

Just came across this gem in the 2024 Republican Platform. Who's going to tell them?

I'm very happy to have successfully defended my dissertation this morning. After eight years at UT Austin as the first student to begin and then finish the JD/PhD in Gov. program, I'm done!

Four years ago I wrote a piece for the now-defunct A House Divided website about Vance & Mazars. This same title applies to recent events.

Writing is happening👀

Our principal contribution is to offer a more fleshed-out definition of "judicial aggrandizement" and to begin explaining why it is an especially helpful concept to analyze the Supreme Court today.

Page proof day! This will be out soon with the Penn Law Review Online! @beaubaumann.bsky.social. All the Penn Law editors we've worked with have been AMAZING!