Ray Garner 🏳️‍🌈
banner
astronoray.bsky.social
Ray Garner 🏳️‍🌈
@astronoray.bsky.social
Astronomer. Nature photographer. Astro postdoc at Texas A&M. he/him. Georgia native, College Station resident.
My very first undergrad presented the research that we worked on for the past year! I'm so proud of Liv and all of the work that she's put into this project, especially over the summer. Any future undergrads have some big shoes to fill! (And keep an eye out for the Research Note we'll publish soon!)
July 30, 2025 at 6:18 PM
So this is a strong piece of evidence for the hypothesis that what we call 5474 is actually a dwarf spiral and dwarf elliptical pair! They're likely bound to each other, but weakly interacting. How this plays into the M101-NGC 5474 interaction is anyone's guess.
March 3, 2025 at 4:35 PM
The velocity maps show similar results. In each map, the bulge is a coherent structure and stands out in the velocity difference map at velocities of 20-40 km/s.

Our two methods agree! 🥳 There is a clear velocity offset between the disk and the bulge.
March 3, 2025 at 4:35 PM
Circular apertures ranging from 5" to 20" were placed on the bulge and we summed up all the light. Fitting the resulting spectra with pPXF and bootstrapping within the residuals shows a clear velocity difference between the stars (bulge) and gas (disk) of ~25 km/s!
March 3, 2025 at 4:35 PM
30 Dor (left) is the largest, most booming star-forming region in our local group. Yesterday, I attended a talk that, using JWST images, found ~1300 super star clusters in M82 (right) with similar masses to 30 Dor.

That little galaxy is BOOMING!
February 19, 2025 at 3:31 PM
Read this exchange in a Star Wars book I'm reading and I thought it worth sharing.
February 16, 2025 at 6:41 PM
Oh how times (and logos) change! I spent some time at CWRU this week and shared some of the work I've been up to as a postdoc in SIGNALS. I also got to sit down with @chrismihos.bsky.social and convince him we still have some work to do together! It was great seeing everyone and reminiscing!
February 13, 2025 at 3:48 PM
No, unless it is a judicial warrant signed by a judge, you do not have to comply. ICE typically only carries administrative warrants which do not allow access to non-public areas. Know your rights!
February 6, 2025 at 4:23 PM
I'm entirely convinced that Saturday will be January 32nd.
January 30, 2025 at 3:46 AM
"There she stands, so tall and mighty
Her gaze facing the East
At her back our doors are closing
As we grin and bare our teeth
On the wind the wolves are howling
She cries, they're drawn near
Well turn around, turn around my darling
Oh, the wolves are here"
"The Wolves" by Watchhouse
January 20, 2025 at 6:06 PM
Put here without comment.
January 20, 2025 at 2:47 AM
when the 'save' button doesn't take me directly to my files
December 10, 2024 at 3:09 PM
They get one ghost with a silencer. (Out of network fees apply.)
December 7, 2024 at 7:42 PM
Incorporating dust extinction through the color excess, E(B-V), into the anti-correlation does reduce the scatter significantly. This panel is a "fundamental plane" combining dust and O/H on the x-axis and ion. param. on the y-axis. The scatter went down from 0.3 to 0.2!
December 3, 2024 at 4:40 PM
But now, what of the correlation? Theoretical predictions say there should be a slope of -0.8. When we plot ours, we get a slope of -0.67, an anti-correlation!

What causes this? At high O/H, stellar winds are more opaque and scatter photons better, leading to lower ion. param.! (Dopita+06)
December 3, 2024 at 4:40 PM
Another test of our methods was to reproduce observed radial gradients in O/H, ion. param., and N/O. Turns out we can reproduce these fairly well within the uncertainties!
December 3, 2024 at 4:40 PM
That means that I created my own Cloudy models (with help of Grace Olivier!) and applied a Bayesian code called NebulaBayes to associate a model with each HII region. This was a lot of work, picking priors, likelihoods, and error weighting! But comparing with CHAOS shows a good agreement!
December 3, 2024 at 4:40 PM
First, we need to estimate the ion. parameter and oxy. abundance. We know that the calibs. for O/H disagree with each other, and it turns out so do the ion. calibs.! It probably is caused by assumptions in the modeling process, old atomic data, stellar SEDs, and/or chemical abundances.
December 3, 2024 at 4:40 PM
The data collected as part of SIGNALS is primed to tackle this question. Taken with SITELLE at CFHT, we've got data for all the strong optical emission lines across a huge FOV and great spectral (R~5000) and spatial (~35 pc) resolution. Below is our deep image of NGC 628 and some HII regions.
December 3, 2024 at 4:40 PM
Variations in the oxygen abundance and ionization parameter are usually thought to be the dominant factors that produce emission line spectra. But are these two physically related? Turns out, people get different answers! Some say they're correlated, some say anti-correlated, others say no!
December 3, 2024 at 4:40 PM
Hey y'all! My first paper as a postdoc has hit the arXiv today! As part of the SIGNALS collaboration, I used data we had for over 1500 HII regions in the galaxy NGC 628 to investigate the abundance-ionization correlation! Read about it here and on the arXiv!

arxiv.org/abs/2412.01680
December 3, 2024 at 4:40 PM
Thankful for the soul, and thankful for the breath.
Thankful for this life, though it leads to death.
December 1, 2024 at 8:09 PM
Thankful for the karma, and thankful for the faith.
Thankful for the values, no matter what it takes.
December 1, 2024 at 8:09 PM
Thankful for the clouds, thankful for the rains.
Thankful for the misery, and occasional pains.
December 1, 2024 at 8:09 PM
Thankful for the wind, and thankful for the tree.
Thankful for the whispers, that set me free.
December 1, 2024 at 8:09 PM