Pavlov started out years ago with really full on anti-china stuff to get attention.
His whole thing start to finish is just trying to get attention, completely shameless, any hot button topic will do, so long as he gets eyes on him.

Before even getting to following officers directions, I genuinely cannot fathom how the situation even escalated to the point of use of lethal force. I see a lot of people talking about her reaction to their directions, but it shouldn't have reached the point of confrontation and directions.

I'm not American, and I learned a little bit about Harriet Tubman recently.
Everyone online constantly talks about there being no plan, no organisation, but if there were some serious effort going on you definitely wouldn't see it talked about up here.

Oh and you have to pay the hospital bill. And you weren't even interacting directly with the AI, it's IN your device like they want to do with windows 11.
You just had a bad day, but the AI can't tell the difference, so it goes way overboard and fucks everything up more, that's the hypothetical.

Isn't it the case in many if not most elections that there's a difference of around 2-5%? This headline is talking like this is new? And some kind of problem/crisis?! I fucking hate this I need to do the courses to write actual better trash that isn't ragebait.

Unironically thinking about dipping back into childhood nostalgia and buying the newest edition of the encyclopaedia britannica for general things. I can slowly see discourse devolving into " *points to book* " as a response to people using AI to validate their spontaneous thoughts.

Instead of Mordor, they chose Lessdor

It doesn't really strike me as strange. Christendom over the last 2,000 years has done countless atrocities. The world simply doesn't understand god's vision for the world and their definition of love, peace, compassion is incorrect - according to certain groups of christians. It's nothing new :(

What if I'm like, really nice and funny and sweet and we have a couple mocktails and some really good conversation and you're like "hey I could make an exception and do a ranking this one time, as a treat"

In a couple months he'll come up with fiefdoms and serfdoms. He will have zero awareness that the concept exists and consider it an ethical solution. It's like the train bro, they do this all the time.

If they won't put the effort into writing something, why should I put the effort into reading it? Forcing a one-sided, one-way communication between two people is generally regarded as very rude.
If I'm not worth the effort to talk with properly, then don't talk to me at all.

Did they consider bringing the director down from the air? See, this is why you can do it, you're down to earth.

I know this might not make sense but I'm not pitching a crossover episode or an expanded universe. Think of it more like fusion food. References and "continuity" are there, but it's its own thing still. Kind of like how Lucifer is CSI + an extremely loose adaptation of the DC characters.

And just one season too, deliberately one season with a few "filler" and a few story episodes for some variety, keep it light, nothing you need to keep mental tabs for (which isn't bad, just would probably not help deliver this concept)

Pirate Bay or Limewire?

If they wanted an endless wellspring of poor quality ideas that vaguely pass as usable and interesting they should have just hired me.