Using weak or misrepresented scientific evidence to argue a non-scientific point isn't just dishonest, it's also unnecessary.
Using weak or misrepresented scientific evidence to argue a non-scientific point isn't just dishonest, it's also unnecessary.
www.jneurosci.org/content/39/3...
www.jneurosci.org/content/39/3...
edition.cnn.com/2025/01/09/p...
edition.cnn.com/2025/01/09/p...
gizmodo.com/41-of-employ...
gizmodo.com/41-of-employ...
www.abc.net.au/news/2025-01...
www.reuters.com/sustainabili...
www.abc.net.au/news/2025-01...
www.reuters.com/sustainabili...