Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar
banner
asanchez-tojar.bsky.social
Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar
@asanchez-tojar.bsky.social
Evolutionary ecologist striving for better science. Meta-analyst & Meta-researcher. Principal Investigator @ucoimbra.bsky.social. Board of Directors of SORTEE (@sortee.bsky.social). Receiving & Data Editor
@Ecology_Letters. M 2:37, HM 72:49, FTP 4.45W/kg
Thank you, Clemens! Thanks for the support and the kind words. We should catch up soon. Cheers!
November 14, 2025 at 3:16 PM
Thank you so much! Really excited to join the team & to continue our work together advancing #MetaResearch & #OpenScience

To everyone interested in reliable, transparent & open science, make sure to follow @excelscior-era.bsky.social for updates on projects and collaborations! #ResearchIntegrity
November 5, 2025 at 7:07 AM
Reposted by Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar
All the open science knowledge and training I accumulated over the years, I did my best to apply it!

Find the pre-registration: doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/S7J6Z

The code and data are on Github: github.com/shreyadimri/...

And the manuscript is built with Quarto: shreyadimri.github.io/Green_Nest_M...
OSF
doi.org
November 3, 2025 at 1:55 PM
Thanks, Phil! I confirm it is indeed a really, really cool place.
November 3, 2025 at 2:26 PM
Reposted by Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar
To address this, we conducted a pre-registered #systematicreview and #metaanalysis of experiments testing Green Nest Material’s effect on avian fitness proxies 🐦

We synthesised 274 effect sizes from 28 studies on 7 species across 17 regions

📄 doi.org/10.32942/X2X...
November 3, 2025 at 7:29 AM
Muchas gracias!
November 3, 2025 at 2:13 PM
Thanks a lot, Eneko!
November 3, 2025 at 2:12 PM
Huge thanks and congratulations to my PhD student & lead author @shreyadimri.bsky.social, her first first-author study!

💯 Exemplary work: rigorous, detailed, reproducible & insightful

🙏 Thanks also to Klaus Reinhold, all authors who shared data, & the @dfg.de for funding

📄 doi.org/10.32942/X2X...
Why do birds use green nest material? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experiments
doi.org
November 3, 2025 at 7:36 AM
⚠️ Limitations: high heterogeneity suggests low generality, potential small-study effects, and taxonomic bias (3 species dominate)

We share our pre-registration and all materials to support transparency and reproducibility:

🧾 doi.org/10.17605/OSF...

💾 github.com/shreyadimri/...
November 3, 2025 at 7:33 AM
The effect tended to be stronger when Green Nest Material was added continuously throughout nesting. However, experimental design was the strongest predictor, challenging the idea that aromatic compounds alone explain GNM’s fitness benefits

📄 doi.org/10.32942/X2X...
November 3, 2025 at 7:32 AM
On average, nests with added Green Nest Material showed higher fitness estimates (statistically significant so only for SMDH). Results were robust to sensitivity analyses, yet heterogeneity was high.

GNM can enhance fitness, but its functional role remains unresolved

📄 doi.org/10.32942/X2X...
November 3, 2025 at 7:30 AM
To address this, we conducted a pre-registered #systematicreview and #metaanalysis of experiments testing Green Nest Material’s effect on avian fitness proxies 🐦

We synthesised 274 effect sizes from 28 studies on 7 species across 17 regions

📄 doi.org/10.32942/X2X...
November 3, 2025 at 7:29 AM
Thank you, Mark!
November 2, 2025 at 6:51 PM
Yes, indeed. Thanks, Ana. I have been meaning to write to you for a while, and did not manage. We should catch up soon.
November 2, 2025 at 6:50 PM