Easily the story of the year IMO.
November 7, 2025 at 3:20 AM
Easily the story of the year IMO.
Reposted by tern
The pattern here is personalism. Trump views the federal treasury as a discretionary fund for dispensing patronage and largesse; he regards the White House as his private property; he regards DOJ as (literally) his personal lawyers, & the military & law enforcement as his personal security team.
October 24, 2025 at 7:07 PM
The pattern here is personalism. Trump views the federal treasury as a discretionary fund for dispensing patronage and largesse; he regards the White House as his private property; he regards DOJ as (literally) his personal lawyers, & the military & law enforcement as his personal security team.
Framing this as a “preferential funding” offer deeply misrepresents the actual contents of the proposal.
It would effectively allow Trump to revoke *all* Vandy’s federal funding on a whim. It would destroy the university’s independence and credibility. Only a fool would sign.
It would effectively allow Trump to revoke *all* Vandy’s federal funding on a whim. It would destroy the university’s independence and credibility. Only a fool would sign.
October 10, 2025 at 8:59 PM
Framing this as a “preferential funding” offer deeply misrepresents the actual contents of the proposal.
It would effectively allow Trump to revoke *all* Vandy’s federal funding on a whim. It would destroy the university’s independence and credibility. Only a fool would sign.
It would effectively allow Trump to revoke *all* Vandy’s federal funding on a whim. It would destroy the university’s independence and credibility. Only a fool would sign.
Exactly. Let’s design infrastructure that allows people to make mistakes and not die as a result.
September 28, 2025 at 2:31 AM
Exactly. Let’s design infrastructure that allows people to make mistakes and not die as a result.
Traffic is fundamentally a geometry problem, not a technology problem.
That’s why, although AVs may solve other problems, they won’t fix traffic.
That’s why, although AVs may solve other problems, they won’t fix traffic.
September 17, 2025 at 3:42 PM
Traffic is fundamentally a geometry problem, not a technology problem.
That’s why, although AVs may solve other problems, they won’t fix traffic.
That’s why, although AVs may solve other problems, they won’t fix traffic.
