FWIW, I'm pretty sure from looking at it in context, OP was being sarcastic. But Poe's law plays, of course.

You're being either credulous or complicit by pretending the thin veneer of plausible deniability has any merit. I can't imagine any college instructor passing an equivalently superficial analysis, filled with poorly defended assertions of opinion, even if it was a religious studies class.

All this notwithstanding the surrounding context making it clear that she intentionally wrote a failing essay which also mentioned her religious beliefs so that she could blame her bad grade on religious board and in so doing threaten the career/safety of a trans teacher.

Do you believe there should be baseline expectations that college be able to write with a coherent structure and support their claims with evidence? Because my 5th grader's teacher would ask for rewrites on that "essay". At best it demonstrated she read one sentence.

If you had friends at Turning Point, yeah, probably.

Note that she spends the bulk of the text arguing that men and women are inherently different before claiming "society pushing the lie that there are multiple genders... is demonic".

If this work is representative of her ability, her progression through the university is a stain on OU's reputation.

Thanks, just picked it up for the same price off Google Play, too: play.google.com/store/books/...

Micah, I need you to tell me if this is a weird perspective thing in the photo, or does this man actually look like his own bobblehead?

As a former FCPS student/resident, this surprises me not at all.