Andreas Stokkendal
@andreasstok.bsky.social
Geograf. Klimapolitisk rådgiver @ Common Agenda. Carbon removal og arealanvendelse.
Reposted by Andreas Stokkendal
The graph below shows the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions from Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) vehicles and EVs. The embodied carbon from battery manufacture is yellow in the graph.
You can see that it’s dwarfed by the emission savings from driving EVs compared to ICE vehicles.
You can see that it’s dwarfed by the emission savings from driving EVs compared to ICE vehicles.
February 9, 2025 at 10:22 AM
The graph below shows the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions from Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) vehicles and EVs. The embodied carbon from battery manufacture is yellow in the graph.
You can see that it’s dwarfed by the emission savings from driving EVs compared to ICE vehicles.
You can see that it’s dwarfed by the emission savings from driving EVs compared to ICE vehicles.
All time classic!
February 7, 2025 at 5:10 PM
All time classic!
Stærkt! Hvor kan man finde flere detaljer om berettigede investeringer?
January 30, 2025 at 9:27 PM
Stærkt! Hvor kan man finde flere detaljer om berettigede investeringer?
Læs den fulde historie her: www.desmog.com/2025/01/14/e...
Exclusive: Norway’s Equinor Forced to Withdraw Key Carbon Capture Claim
This story is the tenth part of a DeSmog series on carbon capture and was developed with the support of Journalismfund Europe. Equinor has retracted a claim that it stores about a million tonnes of ca...
www.desmog.com
January 17, 2025 at 11:20 AM
Læs den fulde historie her: www.desmog.com/2025/01/14/e...
Reposted by Andreas Stokkendal
Also, two other things: 1) These temperature targets refer to long term averages, so one year over 1.5°C isn’t reaching that target. 2) 1.5°C is a policy target and not a geophysical target. Nothing magical happens at 1.5°C.
January 10, 2025 at 5:15 AM
Also, two other things: 1) These temperature targets refer to long term averages, so one year over 1.5°C isn’t reaching that target. 2) 1.5°C is a policy target and not a geophysical target. Nothing magical happens at 1.5°C.