AmeliaAltare
@ameliaaltare.bsky.social
transgender!!! 21+ she/her/it/its
something of a catgirlfag
one piece, yakuza, final fantasy
video game completionist https://truesteamachievements.com/gamer/AmeliaAltare
ameliaaltare on tumblr
something of a catgirlfag
one piece, yakuza, final fantasy
video game completionist https://truesteamachievements.com/gamer/AmeliaAltare
ameliaaltare on tumblr
I struggle to see the logic here tbh. Sex work historically is pretty miserable, but inherently? The problems that exist with sex work exist only in a patriarchal, capitalist society. Without the exploitative nature of employment and fear of poverty, wheres the problem?
December 31, 2024 at 3:41 AM
I struggle to see the logic here tbh. Sex work historically is pretty miserable, but inherently? The problems that exist with sex work exist only in a patriarchal, capitalist society. Without the exploitative nature of employment and fear of poverty, wheres the problem?
research the integrity of the wealthy. it'll be tough, since it doesn't exist.
December 31, 2024 at 3:28 AM
research the integrity of the wealthy. it'll be tough, since it doesn't exist.
how many of the world's billionaires would? apparently being an anti-arab zionist is what's profitable. no one who's entire image is making money would dare say those words, billionaires don't have morals like us.
December 31, 2024 at 3:20 AM
how many of the world's billionaires would? apparently being an anti-arab zionist is what's profitable. no one who's entire image is making money would dare say those words, billionaires don't have morals like us.
Reposted by AmeliaAltare
there are so many clues
1. the fbi logo in the corner
2. he sounds like he's reading off a script at gunpoint
3. "BIPOC creatives of color"
4. the bad jokes
come on people 😭😭😭 have a little sense of humor
1. the fbi logo in the corner
2. he sounds like he's reading off a script at gunpoint
3. "BIPOC creatives of color"
4. the bad jokes
come on people 😭😭😭 have a little sense of humor
December 22, 2024 at 3:53 PM
there are so many clues
1. the fbi logo in the corner
2. he sounds like he's reading off a script at gunpoint
3. "BIPOC creatives of color"
4. the bad jokes
come on people 😭😭😭 have a little sense of humor
1. the fbi logo in the corner
2. he sounds like he's reading off a script at gunpoint
3. "BIPOC creatives of color"
4. the bad jokes
come on people 😭😭😭 have a little sense of humor
I rarely call myself a transsexual but like, I was male and now I am female. it's in the whole m2f package, hell its the name! my sex got transd so like, yeah transsexual is an accurate term.
December 21, 2024 at 10:34 PM
I rarely call myself a transsexual but like, I was male and now I am female. it's in the whole m2f package, hell its the name! my sex got transd so like, yeah transsexual is an accurate term.
my god you've also got a bag of nothing for a brain. "was criticized for" does not mean that that was the case. even if it were, a small amount of labor is still labor. the only way for art to have no feeling involved is with a machine.
your world is simplistic and doesn't involve critical thought.
your world is simplistic and doesn't involve critical thought.
December 21, 2024 at 3:54 AM
my god you've also got a bag of nothing for a brain. "was criticized for" does not mean that that was the case. even if it were, a small amount of labor is still labor. the only way for art to have no feeling involved is with a machine.
your world is simplistic and doesn't involve critical thought.
your world is simplistic and doesn't involve critical thought.
there are no counterarguments out there that work on people like you. to me, name calling is the universal declaration of "there is no way forward with this argument because the other believes some genuinely deranged shit". you're right that it is a sign of giving up though.
December 21, 2024 at 3:49 AM
there are no counterarguments out there that work on people like you. to me, name calling is the universal declaration of "there is no way forward with this argument because the other believes some genuinely deranged shit". you're right that it is a sign of giving up though.
name an art movement where the art was not a product of labor. and yes, because we don't live in a static world of images alone. in your world, are pretty pictures just pretty pictures? do you not value work? or the deception that work was done?
December 21, 2024 at 3:46 AM
name an art movement where the art was not a product of labor. and yes, because we don't live in a static world of images alone. in your world, are pretty pictures just pretty pictures? do you not value work? or the deception that work was done?
if you make a piece of art by bashing babies heads in with a mallet to use their blood for red paint, and another identical one using regular red paint, they are not in fact the same. their value is inherently different because of what people know about their creation. it's extreme, but its the same
December 21, 2024 at 3:42 AM
if you make a piece of art by bashing babies heads in with a mallet to use their blood for red paint, and another identical one using regular red paint, they are not in fact the same. their value is inherently different because of what people know about their creation. it's extreme, but its the same
with no appreciation for the human aspect, it only makes sense that you think two theoretically identical images, one made by AI and one made by a person, have no differences. the end result is the same, sure, but that's a very small part of what art actually is.
December 21, 2024 at 3:40 AM
with no appreciation for the human aspect, it only makes sense that you think two theoretically identical images, one made by AI and one made by a person, have no differences. the end result is the same, sure, but that's a very small part of what art actually is.
you can't get the concept that yes actually, the image changes based on who made it. no work was done in the creation of an AI image. it's not impressive, there's no feeling. art is emotion put in an image. the work matters, it's one of the first things people think of when they think of art.
December 21, 2024 at 3:37 AM
you can't get the concept that yes actually, the image changes based on who made it. no work was done in the creation of an AI image. it's not impressive, there's no feeling. art is emotion put in an image. the work matters, it's one of the first things people think of when they think of art.
you keep taking my arguments and adding shit that i did not say! i did not say that that is how data is stored, the analogy was pointing out that pixels contribute to the stored data. this is pedantic garbage anyways. may your work be forever stolen. goodbye.
December 21, 2024 at 3:32 AM
you keep taking my arguments and adding shit that i did not say! i did not say that that is how data is stored, the analogy was pointing out that pixels contribute to the stored data. this is pedantic garbage anyways. may your work be forever stolen. goodbye.
it would, at least in theory. MS paint may have been a poor analogy? i dont know how exactly it downscales. it was an analogy, the point was that pixels contribute to whatever is being scraped. they literally make the images, the only way they wouldn't be is if it didn't scrape them at all.
December 21, 2024 at 3:29 AM
it would, at least in theory. MS paint may have been a poor analogy? i dont know how exactly it downscales. it was an analogy, the point was that pixels contribute to whatever is being scraped. they literally make the images, the only way they wouldn't be is if it didn't scrape them at all.
twitter is the AI cock-sucking website, what even makes you wanna post here? is it just to post ragebait and engagement farm?
December 21, 2024 at 3:19 AM
twitter is the AI cock-sucking website, what even makes you wanna post here? is it just to post ragebait and engagement farm?
alright lol i'm done w you. you can't get over that machines aren't people, maybe you're a bit too into one of those AI girlfriends and it's made you say insane shit like "they learn just like you!" they don't. they use an algorithm to pick up data directly from images. not humans.
December 21, 2024 at 3:19 AM
alright lol i'm done w you. you can't get over that machines aren't people, maybe you're a bit too into one of those AI girlfriends and it's made you say insane shit like "they learn just like you!" they don't. they use an algorithm to pick up data directly from images. not humans.
it'd be like copying and pasting an image into ms paint and scrunching it into a twentieth of the resolution. do you maintain every pixel? no. does every pixel still directly affect the scrunched image? yes. therefore every pixel is being used.
December 21, 2024 at 3:15 AM
it'd be like copying and pasting an image into ms paint and scrunching it into a twentieth of the resolution. do you maintain every pixel? no. does every pixel still directly affect the scrunched image? yes. therefore every pixel is being used.
every pixel of every image is translated to the data it can store and use. you're ignoring the initial scraping step like it doesn't exist, when its a key part of what i'm saying. it doesn't have to store the image directly in order to copy the image.
December 21, 2024 at 3:14 AM
every pixel of every image is translated to the data it can store and use. you're ignoring the initial scraping step like it doesn't exist, when its a key part of what i'm saying. it doesn't have to store the image directly in order to copy the image.
just because you copy from a million sources at once doesn't make it not copying lmao. people have also tried this, many people have plagiarized many little bits of other people's works in order to hopefully get around plagiarism checks. it doesn't work there and it doesn't work here.
December 21, 2024 at 2:59 AM
just because you copy from a million sources at once doesn't make it not copying lmao. people have also tried this, many people have plagiarized many little bits of other people's works in order to hopefully get around plagiarism checks. it doesn't work there and it doesn't work here.
finally u figured out how to read, literally what I've been saying. the source makes the art garbage though, 99% of art is what's being conveyed and a machine has nothing to convey. it can produce images that look identical to human art and its still a tech demo at best. never art.
December 21, 2024 at 2:57 AM
finally u figured out how to read, literally what I've been saying. the source makes the art garbage though, 99% of art is what's being conveyed and a machine has nothing to convey. it can produce images that look identical to human art and its still a tech demo at best. never art.
they actually should, it's a pretty damn big shame that artists don't have any control over their art, and dont get credited. but clearly you're not ready for a convo about artist rights, you can't even see the issues with the most egregious examples like AI.
December 21, 2024 at 2:52 AM
they actually should, it's a pretty damn big shame that artists don't have any control over their art, and dont get credited. but clearly you're not ready for a convo about artist rights, you can't even see the issues with the most egregious examples like AI.
AI has images, pixel for pixel, embedded within its design. Scraping data for use with a model is far different from a human seeing an image, processing it, and making something with that knowledge. your idea is fundamentally flawed because people are not machines, they should not be treated like it
December 21, 2024 at 2:43 AM
AI has images, pixel for pixel, embedded within its design. Scraping data for use with a model is far different from a human seeing an image, processing it, and making something with that knowledge. your idea is fundamentally flawed because people are not machines, they should not be treated like it
copywrite law is not a basis for morality. copywrite law as it exists is fucked to hell and hardly ever benefits independent artists. everyone knows this, it's a poor argument. irresponsible use in this case includes use of AI without explicit disclosure. citing a model or a dataset is the minimum.
December 21, 2024 at 2:37 AM
copywrite law is not a basis for morality. copywrite law as it exists is fucked to hell and hardly ever benefits independent artists. everyone knows this, it's a poor argument. irresponsible use in this case includes use of AI without explicit disclosure. citing a model or a dataset is the minimum.
read my words, as I said intent is what matters. errors are viewed differently based on if it's human or AI error. they can look the same, but it's art. it's about feeling. AI art could be identical, the appearance is a technology issue and not the moral issue everyone has with it.
December 21, 2024 at 2:35 AM
read my words, as I said intent is what matters. errors are viewed differently based on if it's human or AI error. they can look the same, but it's art. it's about feeling. AI art could be identical, the appearance is a technology issue and not the moral issue everyone has with it.
or, what you'll probably do, ignore and keep fucking over and stealing from artists with irresponsible use of an unregulated technology. it's cool tech, but at the end of the day this application doesnt help anyone. you might even be risking a lawsuit in the future if AI art gets properly regulated.
December 21, 2024 at 1:06 AM
or, what you'll probably do, ignore and keep fucking over and stealing from artists with irresponsible use of an unregulated technology. it's cool tech, but at the end of the day this application doesnt help anyone. you might even be risking a lawsuit in the future if AI art gets properly regulated.
lol all you have are jokes and tricks.I admit my mistake, my eyes played tricks on me when looking for AI errors (the intent of your deception) and I couldn't see the definition on the saddle. Looked like the horse had a massive hole in its back.
try and argue with the actual point, you'll struggle.
try and argue with the actual point, you'll struggle.
December 21, 2024 at 1:01 AM
lol all you have are jokes and tricks.I admit my mistake, my eyes played tricks on me when looking for AI errors (the intent of your deception) and I couldn't see the definition on the saddle. Looked like the horse had a massive hole in its back.
try and argue with the actual point, you'll struggle.
try and argue with the actual point, you'll struggle.