AlmostFestive✨
LightNews LightNews
banner
almostordinary.etheric-veil.com
AlmostFestive✨
@almostordinary.etheric-veil.com
160 followers 210 following 260 posts
Computer toucher, wannabe author, mediocre photographer, knows how to scribble a pen on a touchpad sometimes, general idiot. they/them/any
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by AlmostFestive✨
goodlawproject.org
This is the key paragraph in the Sandie Peggie decision.
(i) The Supreme Court decision 789. The question that arises from that conclusion is whether the application of the Supreme Court decision must mean that, under the provisions over which this Tribunal has jurisdiction under the 2010 Act as to work, the second respondent as a biological male required to be excluded from the female changing room, such that the permission given by the first respondent to do so was necessarily unlawful under those provisions. We have concluded that the answer is in the negative.
December 8, 2025 at 2:07 PM