alex block
banner
alexblock.bsky.social
alex block
@alexblock.bsky.social
cities, transportation, transit, and other intermittent discussion.
They’d better use this for bumper music
November 11, 2025 at 2:11 AM
Given this, it’s still wild to me OAK got BART to pay for their airport people mover
November 9, 2025 at 4:22 AM
The thing about the detached engine taking the pylon with it suggests maybe metal fatigue where the pylon meets the wing? If so, that’s bad
November 8, 2025 at 2:00 PM
I don’t think that’s the logic at all.

The region passed a tax and plan that requires a long-distance line; and that distance requires a fast, direct ROW; cost requires looking for ROWs that already exist (opposed to tunneling to Lynnwood) and the most direct extant ROW is the interstate
November 7, 2025 at 8:08 PM
Reposted by alex block
Kiss and Ride is not just an American thing, either -- here's the Swedish wayfinding for it.
November 7, 2025 at 5:13 PM
The bus loop (green) is trying to make bus-rail transfers as easy as possible.

The actual kiss and ride facility there (yellow) is tiny by comparison.
November 7, 2025 at 5:23 PM
Are we? Most of that is the bus loop.
November 7, 2025 at 5:16 PM
Yes; I’m just saying, there’s a notable difference between requiring bay windows to break up the mass, vs. allowing them if you want.
November 7, 2025 at 3:22 PM
The secretary doesn’t really have much discretion about how states spend highway funds Congress has allocated to them, does he?
November 7, 2025 at 3:20 PM
Oh, to be clear, this doesn’t solve any of the construction challenges.

But as a matter of setting up the rules, it’s not a requirement
November 7, 2025 at 3:19 PM
There’s a big difference between rigid design requirements and a generalized zoning rule for the building envelope.
November 7, 2025 at 3:17 PM
DC absolutely has this design in spades, but it’s not a requirement at all; it’s an incentive (that dates back to 1872!) about building projections beyond the property line.

planning.dc.gov/sites/defaul...
planning.dc.gov
November 7, 2025 at 3:11 PM
lol - “But the site is narrow — only 66 feet wide”
November 7, 2025 at 12:29 PM
Yes, the injuries are bad, and the schedule is absurdly difficult.

But there’s absolutely no positive momentum, no hope, no progress. Everything is moving backwards.

bsky.app/profile/chri...
With Fickell and Wisconsin, the QB injuries and schedule have undoubtedly been bad luck. But the player evaluation and development have not been good at all. Can they pull a Virginia and spend enough money to build a better team? We'll find out.

www.nytimes.com/athletic/678...
Wisconsin head coach Luke Fickell will return to Badgers sideline in 2026
The embattled Badgers coach will return for at least one more season, weathering a very hot seat.
www.nytimes.com
November 7, 2025 at 12:27 AM
why don’t the build the whole plane out of the black box?
November 6, 2025 at 5:09 PM