You can’t just say AI tutors are going to teach disadvantaged kids. You might as well say inflatable dentists will solve the NHS backlog.

The casual anthropomorphising of AI has got to stop. They’re not ‘tutors’, it’s software. It’s not ‘one-to-one’, it’s a kid on a screen on their own.

Both? Both!

Or 'massive'?

I was also edging towards twat. Otherwise splitting the difference between "daft bints" (too gendered, potentially too affectionate) and "dumb bitches" (too offensive in UK English)

The post also looks at some of the myriad dangers the Security Institute have discovered when investigating AI models. It's alarming....

@stephenkb.bsky.social @Nicovel0 Wilson’s statement was strong.

We're actually doing a set of Commander decks: Pride & Prejudice (longing counters), Little Women (group hug), Wuthering Heights (Heathcliffe being an ass (stax)) and Jane Eyre (burn).
Aka The Bodice Universe

Yep; I think people are underestimating the extent to which AI might improve the productivity of people who create problems as well as people who solve them.

It's Boris Johnson the Elder