Antti-Ilari Partanen
banner
aipartanen.bsky.social
Antti-Ilari Partanen
@aipartanen.bsky.social
Climate scientist at the Finnish Meteorological Institute using Earth System Models to study e.g. negative emission technologies, carbon budgets, and aerosol climate effects.
Jos otetaan huomioon myös historia ennen ihmistä, niin hapen aiheuttama massasukupuutto yli 2 miljardia vuotta sitten nostaisi hapen varmaan aika korkealle. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_O...
Great Oxidation Event - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
November 25, 2025 at 11:34 AM
The revised calculation regarding overestimated present-day forest-area for Sland makes sense. Could you just calculate Sland in a simpler way as a difference between
S3 and a simulation with historical changes in land cover and harvest rates but climate, N inputs and CO2 from preindustrial?
November 24, 2025 at 1:45 PM
Wow! For long I have been thinking that such a coupled model would be cool, but I haven't come up with good set of research questions for it to write a proposal. I also have had spatial model in mind, but it's probably wise to start with an aggregated model.
October 30, 2025 at 8:45 AM
For nature and hiking, I would also suggest BC. Based on one short visit, Vancouver was also very nice city with beautiful views on the sea and mountains and functional transport system. As a city, Montreal was a great place to live, but Quebec's nature was quite similar to Finland.
October 3, 2025 at 5:27 AM
Thanks for the clarification! I appreciate the character limits, but I think it's good to include the assumption of current policies when giving the 97% certainty. It's important to also communicate that 2 °C is still (likely) avoidable if we implement proper mitigation policies.
September 19, 2025 at 6:20 AM
Does the crossing of 2 °C with 97% certainty assume continuation of current policy? I could not quickly find the original estimate. I would assume that there is a better chance to avoid crossing 2 °C if policies are made more stringent.
September 19, 2025 at 4:51 AM
Joo, jos päästöt olisivat 90-luvulta vähentyneet eikä kasvaneet, niin tilanne olisi tosiaan huomattavasti parempi.
September 17, 2025 at 8:18 AM
Tässä tietääkseni ensimmäinen julkaisu (v. 2008), jossa todettiin että CO₂-päästöt pitää saada nollaan: agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
Stabilizing climate requires near‐zero emissions
Current international climate mitigation efforts aim to stabilize levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. However, human-induced climate warming will continue for many centuries, even after atm...
agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
September 16, 2025 at 12:04 PM
Lisävaikeutena on ollut, että ilmastotieteessäkin on vasta viimeisen 15 vuoden ajan tullut selväksi, että fossiiliset päästöt pitää saada (netto)nollaan. Aiemmin puhuttiin käsittääkseni enemmän lähinnä päästövähennyksistä, ja poliittiset toimet (ja osittain tavoitteetkin vielä) heijastavat tätä.
September 16, 2025 at 11:51 AM