Aidan Wright
banner
aidangcw.bsky.social
Aidan Wright
@aidangcw.bsky.social
Psychopathology | Personality | Quant Methods

Professor of Psychology and Psychiatry | Eisenberg Family Depression Center | University of Michigan

Editor | Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science

Founder and Instructor | www.smart-workshops.com
What a time to be doing research. Leading a project now where collaborators are debating whether it is more compelling to have AI review/summarize something or whether we should use our wet-brains to do it.

The pro AI one accused me of wanting to "armchair it"
November 6, 2025 at 3:52 PM
Treating patients as a psychologist is so much better when working with a good psychiatrist. The best psychiatrist I've ever worked with, Xavier Jimenez, has started posting on instagram/YouTube. Check his posts out:

www.instagram.com/dr.xaviermd/...

www.youtube.com/@Dr.XavierMD...
Instagram
Create an account or log in to Instagram - Share what you're into with the people who get you.
www.instagram.com
November 6, 2025 at 3:46 PM
So, colleagues and I did a pre-registration. Registered a set of primary analyses that all made good sense. Also a bunch of exploratory hypotheses (one collaborator wanted) that seemed reasonable. But now I think the exp models are a bad idea. How would you handle this? Just not do them?

1/2
November 1, 2025 at 5:14 PM
Reposted by Aidan Wright
We're excited this is out! Thanks to the author teams for a range of great contributions and to the reviewers who assisted with this process. The second part of this special issue will be released in November.
Interesting new special issue in Psychological Assessment.

Edited by Kristin Naragon-Gainey and @kstanton.bsky.social

Here's their overview paper: psycnet.apa.org/record/2026-...

And here's our contribution, which will win us no friends:
psycnet.apa.org/record/2026-...
October 26, 2025 at 6:21 PM
At a *cheeky* stationary/novelty store and it seems like they’ve got stuff just for me
October 26, 2025 at 6:22 PM
An increasingly common interaction in basically every venue and medium:

Person 1: Does anyone have any recommendations for good ZYZ?

Person 2: Here’s what ChatGPT said when I asked?

Does person 2 really think person 1 didn’t ask chat GPT already? I think we’re at a stage where they often haven’t
October 25, 2025 at 5:21 PM
Reposted by Aidan Wright
Very cool issue on intensive longitudinal data, including a piece by @aidangcw.bsky.social and others on minimum sample size for estimating various parameters. Sometimes when we move beyond traditional self-report we neglect psychometrics and publish lots of noise. This work can help prevent that.
Interesting new special issue in Psychological Assessment.

Edited by Kristin Naragon-Gainey and @kstanton.bsky.social

Here's their overview paper: psycnet.apa.org/record/2026-...

And here's our contribution, which will win us no friends:
psycnet.apa.org/record/2026-...
October 25, 2025 at 3:00 AM
Reposted by Aidan Wright
Check out our paper examining the ambulatory physiological assessment of PTSD (led by @bwisco.bsky.social) as part of this neat new special issue:

psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?d...
October 24, 2025 at 4:17 PM
Excited to announce a new special issue on Passive Sensing for behavior in psychopathology at JoPaCS led by Dan Fulford and Nick Jacobson

Check out their overview paper here: psycnet.apa.org/record/2026-...
APA PsycNet
psycnet.apa.org
October 24, 2025 at 4:06 PM
Interesting new special issue in Psychological Assessment.

Edited by Kristin Naragon-Gainey and @kstanton.bsky.social

Here's their overview paper: psycnet.apa.org/record/2026-...

And here's our contribution, which will win us no friends:
psycnet.apa.org/record/2026-...
October 24, 2025 at 4:00 PM
Hey @dieworkwear.bsky.social , care to comment?
October 24, 2025 at 3:51 PM
I will give the antivaxxers this

My Covid shot made me feel much worse than my last case of Covid…

Must have had extra 5g
October 22, 2025 at 9:52 AM
I can’t believe how much time and effort has been spent on figuring out and debating the RIGHT or BEST way to test an indirect effect (ie the significance of a*b) when it seems much more intuitive to just say if a and b are both sig, then we have ind effect. Can anyone show me why I might be wrong?
October 21, 2025 at 8:49 PM
At the on campus vaccine clinic today noticed lots of young folks coming in asking for flu but declining Covid.

Just an observation
October 21, 2025 at 7:58 PM
One of the more satisfying aspects of running a lab is being able to tell people they have to use the Oxford comma in research write-ups.
October 21, 2025 at 7:57 PM
Job alert 🚨

Open rank tenure-track faculty position working at the intersection of generative AI modeling and computational psychiatry in UMich Psychiatry. Part of a cluster hire across units. Info at link!

careers.umich.edu/job_detail/2...
PROFESSOR | U-M Careers
careers.umich.edu
October 21, 2025 at 1:19 PM
Anyone have access to or link to sources for secular trends in responses to NEO-PI at facet level over past two decades?
October 20, 2025 at 8:34 PM
Reposted by Aidan Wright
NASSPD is accepting submissions for our 2026 conference in Toronto, April 24-25th! See nasspd.org/conference for conference information and submission portal.

Talks (individual, symposia, data blitz) and clinical workshops due Nov 1st. Posters due Dec 1st.

Hope to see you there!
October 19, 2025 at 7:15 PM
Are you a psychologist with expertise in AI and want a job? My colleagues over at U. Michigan - Dearborn are looking for someone like you!

You can find out info an apply here: careers.umich.edu/job_detail/2...
Assistant Professor in Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence | U-M Careers
careers.umich.edu
October 16, 2025 at 11:23 PM
Reposted by Aidan Wright
Great study! A general implication is that when we infer effects of retrospectively measure variables on outcomes, we’re largely just seeing the effects of how people are currently feeling.
The GSS asked the same people about their childhood income rank three different times. 56% changed their answer, even though what was trying to be measured couldn’t change! We dig into this in a new article at @socialindicators.bsky.social. 



doi.org/10.1007/s112...

🧵👇 (1/5)
Growing up Different(ly than Last Time We Asked): Social Status and Changing Reports of Childhood Income Rank - Social Indicators Research
How we remember our past can be shaped by the realities of our present. This study examines how changes to present circumstances influence retrospective reports of family income rank at age 16. While retrospective survey data can be used to assess the long-term effects of childhood conditions, present-day circumstances may “anchor” memories, causing shifts in how individuals recall and report past experiences. Using panel data from the 2006–2014 General Social Surveys (8,602 observations from 2,883 individuals in the United States), we analyze how changes in objective and subjective indicators of current social status—income, financial satisfaction, and perceived income relative to others—are associated with changes in reports of childhood income rank, and how this varies by sex and race/ethnicity. Fixed-effects models reveal no significant association between changes in income and in childhood income rank. However, changes in subjective measures of social status show contrasting effects, as increases in current financial satisfaction are associated with decreases in childhood income rank, but increases in current perceived relative income are associated with increases in childhood income rank. We argue these opposing effects follow from theories of anchoring in recall bias. We further find these effects are stronger among males but are consistent across racial/ethnic groups. This demographic heterogeneity suggests that recall bias is not evenly distributed across the population and has important implications for how different groups perceive their own pasts. Our findings further highlight the malleability of retrospective perceptions and their sensitivity to current social conditions, offering methodological insights into survey reliability and recall bias.
doi.org
October 14, 2025 at 3:26 PM
Reposted by Aidan Wright
Exciting news from the Academy of Psychological Clinical Science--a joint effort to enhance open science training in clinical psychology!

If you are interested, you can the papers mentioned in the email here:
Van Til et al. osf.io/h34jg/files/...
OSC paper (Lynam et al.) osf.io/preprints/ps...
October 14, 2025 at 2:45 PM
A new take on the limitations of "psychometric networks" now out in Nature Human Behavior. You don't want to put too much confidence in individual edges. Something we cautioned against in 2017.

1/2

www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Statistical evidence in psychological networks - Nature Human Behaviour
Psychometric network models have become increasingly popular in psychology and the social sciences. Huth et al. show that a large proportion of reported network findings are based on weak or inconclusive evidence inviting caution when interpreting results.
www.nature.com
October 12, 2025 at 11:08 AM
Reposted by Aidan Wright
October 8, 2025 at 9:48 PM
Just noticed the classroom I teach in has this
October 8, 2025 at 3:56 PM
Reposted by Aidan Wright
We’ve just published another video on HiTOP that tries to flesh out a bit more how the framework can be helpful in research: youtu.be/q0jOi_Nl1yo

We hope it’s useful, and are keen to hear any feedback

Thanks again so much to @tashtc.bsky.social for all of her hard work creating this video series ✨
Using HiTOP in Research
YouTube video by HiTOP
youtu.be
October 7, 2025 at 11:37 PM