On reading this, it occurs to me that Gaiman could have had an endless supply of WILLING partners for whatever his heart desired, no matter how depraved.
Which means what he really desired was UNWILLING partners.
Which means Neil Gaiman is a rapist.
Period.
January 13, 2025 at 4:55 PM
On reading this, it occurs to me that Gaiman could have had an endless supply of WILLING partners for whatever his heart desired, no matter how depraved.
Which means what he really desired was UNWILLING partners.
Right, you know that thing where you like his work, but heard he has some accusations, and you kind of knew there was some drama with his ex, and you didn't really know what the truth was but you had a feeling there was something, but if you ignored it it wouldn't be real?
Right, you know that thing where you like his work, but heard he has some accusations, and you kind of knew there was some drama with his ex, and you didn't really know what the truth was but you had a feeling there was something, but if you ignored it it wouldn't be real?