Her allegiance is showing, and it’s not to the US government. The fact she sticks to the “narrative” above all else shows her disrespect and disdain for our legislative system. She’s aiming to please party leaders at the expense of our nation’s (wobbly at times) integrity.

Since going back to antenna tv, I’ve been amazed at the number of religious, heavily Christian, channels and programs. And that some openly condone the behavior of the current administration has me shaking my head.

I agree with lack of knowledge about how govt works, locally and at the federal level played a part in the hate for it. How many of his followers are first time voters? How many attend local govt meetings? I’m guessing a lot of people think they don’t have to get involved; that’s for politicians.

Identity politics? To wake up sounds too much like “woke” and that’s “bad.” To question business “decisions” begs the question, “So, you want Socialism?” It still comes down to better dead than red. The choices have been simplified and lines drawn. We must support capitalism at all costs.

And yet “the commoners” seeking gov jobs patiently jump through multiple intrusive hoops hoping to get picked. What does it say when they see leaders like this? That they’re chumps for taking such jobs so seriously?

Lowering the bar for gov positions is only hurting ourselves.

What’s next? I’m betting there’s a checklist that goes from smallest to biggest changes they can get away with, apart from Project 2025. Purely ego stroking and trophy hunting.

I wouldn’t be shocked if they try to sell “separate but equal” as realistic when compared to “idealistic” woke.

And when you remove the people, you also stop them from producing new reports. So now they can’t be referenced in policy decisions. And they probably deleted or removed their previous reports as well.

It’s good to share these details and experiences, with the consent of patient of course. The comments seem to suggest there are A LOT of other similar stories which could possibly be helpful to others.

Maybe the interviewer didn’t want to appear to be prying too much? Just speculating…

Indeed! I’m wondering if that particular PT coverage was based on his status. Maybe it was covered for inpatient only and not covered for outpatient? I’d hate to think all PT was stopped, unless it was capped and then became self pay, which can be expensive without insurance discounts.