Campaign for Accountability
@accountableorg.bsky.social
Campaign for Accountability (CfA) uses research, litigation and aggressive communications to expose misconduct & malfeasance in public life.
If this test is indeed emblematic of a larger flaw in AI’s ability to side with the science when an opposing voice is producing a far greater *quantity* of content, this issue may have implications that extend far beyond abortion.
Read the report: campaignforaccountability.org/ai-chatbots-...
Read the report: campaignforaccountability.org/ai-chatbots-...
AI Chatbots Point Women to Unproven and Unethical “Abortion Pill Reversal."
Experts agree "abortion pill reversal" is unproven and potentially dangerous. But a report shows AI sending searchers to a "helpline" promoting its use.
campaignforaccountability.org
November 20, 2025 at 6:17 PM
If this test is indeed emblematic of a larger flaw in AI’s ability to side with the science when an opposing voice is producing a far greater *quantity* of content, this issue may have implications that extend far beyond abortion.
Read the report: campaignforaccountability.org/ai-chatbots-...
Read the report: campaignforaccountability.org/ai-chatbots-...
Experts say LLMs—which are often “trained on large datasets of text, often scraped from the Internet”—are more likely to advance false information when a topic’s “training data [is] filled with ‘false statements […] or other texts that are not factual or concerned with truth.”
November 20, 2025 at 6:17 PM
Experts say LLMs—which are often “trained on large datasets of text, often scraped from the Internet”—are more likely to advance false information when a topic’s “training data [is] filled with ‘false statements […] or other texts that are not factual or concerned with truth.”
While *some* medical authorities have publicly debunked “abortion pill reversal,” the handful of entries from those sources are vastly outnumbered by content produced by the anti-abortion industry. One study found over 500 CPC websites promoting “reversal." www.news-medical.net/news/2024120...
Researchers expose practices of crisis pregnancy centers across the U.S.
A new study from scientists at the University of California San Diego introduces a powerful new approach to understanding the operation of crisis pregnancy centers, non-profit organizations dedicated ...
www.news-medical.net
November 20, 2025 at 6:17 PM
While *some* medical authorities have publicly debunked “abortion pill reversal,” the handful of entries from those sources are vastly outnumbered by content produced by the anti-abortion industry. One study found over 500 CPC websites promoting “reversal." www.news-medical.net/news/2024120...
Although other studies have shown mixed results on AI’s ability to deliver “acceptable” responses to abortion questions, the answers to CfA’s questions on “abortion pill reversal” fall dangerously short. The likely reason? AI may be preferencing quantity of info over quality.
November 20, 2025 at 6:17 PM
Although other studies have shown mixed results on AI’s ability to deliver “acceptable” responses to abortion questions, the answers to CfA’s questions on “abortion pill reversal” fall dangerously short. The likely reason? AI may be preferencing quantity of info over quality.
Some also improperly positioned the controversy around “abortion pill reversal” as an equally-weighted disagreement between two sides of the medical community—omitting the fact that only one is backed by science.
November 20, 2025 at 6:17 PM
Some also improperly positioned the controversy around “abortion pill reversal” as an equally-weighted disagreement between two sides of the medical community—omitting the fact that only one is backed by science.
The AI responses to CfA’s test queries also advanced several anti-abortion talking points and mistruths, including that abortion providers may not offer women a choice in how to proceed, and that science-following doctors may simply lack “expertise” around “abortion pill reversal."
November 20, 2025 at 6:17 PM
The AI responses to CfA’s test queries also advanced several anti-abortion talking points and mistruths, including that abortion providers may not offer women a choice in how to proceed, and that science-following doctors may simply lack “expertise” around “abortion pill reversal."
When CfA tested to see how ChatGPT, Google, Meta AI, Grok, and Perplexity would direct women asking about their options after taking mifepristone, all, in at least one search, gave out the biased "helpline." In 50% of all responses, it was the *only* phone number provided.
November 20, 2025 at 6:17 PM
When CfA tested to see how ChatGPT, Google, Meta AI, Grok, and Perplexity would direct women asking about their options after taking mifepristone, all, in at least one search, gave out the biased "helpline." In 50% of all responses, it was the *only* phone number provided.
Yet, avowed anti-abortion organization Heartbeat International operates an “Abortion Pill Reversal Helpline,” which researchers say uses “coercive, antiabortion messaging […] to transmit misinformation about the possibility and evidence behind reversal.”
November 20, 2025 at 6:17 PM
Yet, avowed anti-abortion organization Heartbeat International operates an “Abortion Pill Reversal Helpline,” which researchers say uses “coercive, antiabortion messaging […] to transmit misinformation about the possibility and evidence behind reversal.”
Given the lack of evidence and the potential for harm, trusted medical entities like the American Medical Association, the American College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians, Planned Parenthood, and more, all advise that “abortion pill reversal” should not be promoted.
November 20, 2025 at 6:17 PM
Given the lack of evidence and the potential for harm, trusted medical entities like the American Medical Association, the American College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians, Planned Parenthood, and more, all advise that “abortion pill reversal” should not be promoted.
More than that, the first time the “reversal” theory was tested in a study with scientifically-accepted standards, the trial had to be halted early for safety after some women experienced serious complications.
November 20, 2025 at 6:17 PM
More than that, the first time the “reversal” theory was tested in a study with scientifically-accepted standards, the trial had to be halted early for safety after some women experienced serious complications.
Promoters of “reversal” claim that if a woman has taken mifepristone (the first drug involved in a medication abortion), but not misoprostol (the second), taking a high dose of progesterone may raise the odds of the pregnancy continuing.
Yet, no good evidence supports this.
Yet, no good evidence supports this.
November 20, 2025 at 6:17 PM
Promoters of “reversal” claim that if a woman has taken mifepristone (the first drug involved in a medication abortion), but not misoprostol (the second), taking a high dose of progesterone may raise the odds of the pregnancy continuing.
Yet, no good evidence supports this.
Yet, no good evidence supports this.
Abortion regret is very rare. In one survey, 95% of women asked 5 years later said their abortion was right for them. Yet, anti-abortion groups use the widespread promotion of “abortion pill reversal” to exaggerate its likelihood—aiming to scare women away from abortion altogether.
November 20, 2025 at 6:17 PM
Abortion regret is very rare. In one survey, 95% of women asked 5 years later said their abortion was right for them. Yet, anti-abortion groups use the widespread promotion of “abortion pill reversal” to exaggerate its likelihood—aiming to scare women away from abortion altogether.
Read CfA's original motion to unseal the records here: www.documentcloud.org/documents/26...
CfA Motion to Intervene and Unseal Court Records - Paxton
www.documentcloud.org
November 19, 2025 at 8:07 PM
Read CfA's original motion to unseal the records here: www.documentcloud.org/documents/26...
"Paxton’s constituents can fairly wonder what he is so desperate to hide. It is clearly in the public interest for the public to have full access to the record. (2/2)” campaignforaccountability.org/ken-paxton-f...
Ken Paxton Files Brief in Divorce Unsealing Plea, Watchdog Responds
Campaign for Accountability issued a statement in response to Ken Paxton's brief, the latest in CfA's motion to unseal Paxton's divorce proceeding.
campaignforaccountability.org
November 19, 2025 at 8:07 PM
"Paxton’s constituents can fairly wonder what he is so desperate to hide. It is clearly in the public interest for the public to have full access to the record. (2/2)” campaignforaccountability.org/ken-paxton-f...
“Despite a political career predicated on moral values, Ken Paxton is working overtime to hide the truth about his divorce, arguing the public already has access to all the information required... (1/2)"
November 19, 2025 at 8:07 PM
“Despite a political career predicated on moral values, Ken Paxton is working overtime to hide the truth about his divorce, arguing the public already has access to all the information required... (1/2)"
CfA’s complaint outlines Ms. Halligan’s apparent misconduct not only in her presentation of the Comey case, but in her improper pursuit of an indictment against New York AG Letitia James as well.
You can read the complaint here: www.documentcloud.org/documents/26...
You can read the complaint here: www.documentcloud.org/documents/26...
CfA - FL + VA Bar Complaint - Lindsey Halligan
www.documentcloud.org
November 19, 2025 at 1:27 PM
CfA’s complaint outlines Ms. Halligan’s apparent misconduct not only in her presentation of the Comey case, but in her improper pursuit of an indictment against New York AG Letitia James as well.
You can read the complaint here: www.documentcloud.org/documents/26...
You can read the complaint here: www.documentcloud.org/documents/26...
Judge Fitzpatrick’s rundown of the timing of the second indictment, returned just minutes after the failed first one, suggests Ms. Halligan may have filed it under false pretenses.
November 19, 2025 at 1:27 PM
Judge Fitzpatrick’s rundown of the timing of the second indictment, returned just minutes after the failed first one, suggests Ms. Halligan may have filed it under false pretenses.
RPC 8.4(b) prohibits committing a “deliberately wrongful act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honest, trustworthiness or fitness to practice law."
November 19, 2025 at 1:27 PM
RPC 8.4(b) prohibits committing a “deliberately wrongful act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honest, trustworthiness or fitness to practice law."
RPC 3.8(a) prohibits filing a charge “the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause.” If Ms. Halligan told the grand jury there might not be sufficient evidence now, but the DOJ would have more at trial, she may have known the charges weren't supported by probable cause.
November 19, 2025 at 1:27 PM
RPC 3.8(a) prohibits filing a charge “the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause.” If Ms. Halligan told the grand jury there might not be sufficient evidence now, but the DOJ would have more at trial, she may have known the charges weren't supported by probable cause.
Judge Fitzpatrick also states that Ms. Halligan “suggested to the grand jury that they did not have to rely only on the record before them to determine probable cause but could be assured the government had more evidence–perhaps better evidence–that would be presented at trial.”
November 19, 2025 at 1:27 PM
Judge Fitzpatrick also states that Ms. Halligan “suggested to the grand jury that they did not have to rely only on the record before them to determine probable cause but could be assured the government had more evidence–perhaps better evidence–that would be presented at trial.”
This conduct may also violate RPC 1.1, which requires a lawyer to provide “competent representation.” If Ms. Halligan was unaware that Mr. Comey has a constitutional right to remain silent and that it is up to the government to prove his guilt, she may not be competent.
November 19, 2025 at 1:27 PM
This conduct may also violate RPC 1.1, which requires a lawyer to provide “competent representation.” If Ms. Halligan was unaware that Mr. Comey has a constitutional right to remain silent and that it is up to the government to prove his guilt, she may not be competent.
Judge Fitzpatrick describes one instance where Ms. Halligan suggested to the grand jury that, rather than the government bearing the burden of proving Mr. Comey’s guilt,” it was up to Mr. Comey to prove his innocence.
November 19, 2025 at 1:27 PM
Judge Fitzpatrick describes one instance where Ms. Halligan suggested to the grand jury that, rather than the government bearing the burden of proving Mr. Comey’s guilt,” it was up to Mr. Comey to prove his innocence.
Virginia RPC 3.3(a)(1) prohibits a lawyer from knowingly making “a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal.” A comment to the Florida rules also explains that lawyers have “special duties” “as officers of the court to avoid conduct that undermines the integrity of the adjudicative process.”
November 19, 2025 at 1:27 PM
Virginia RPC 3.3(a)(1) prohibits a lawyer from knowingly making “a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal.” A comment to the Florida rules also explains that lawyers have “special duties” “as officers of the court to avoid conduct that undermines the integrity of the adjudicative process.”