A. Carlon
@acarlon.bsky.social
You mean you weren’t papering Wall Street this afternoon?
June 5, 2025 at 9:01 PM
You mean you weren’t papering Wall Street this afternoon?
I’m confused—didn’t Columbia acquiesce to just this with respect to its Middle East studies department? @mattspast.bsky.social is there some nuance that I’m missing (or that got eliminated in the editing process)?
April 16, 2025 at 8:38 PM
I’m confused—didn’t Columbia acquiesce to just this with respect to its Middle East studies department? @mattspast.bsky.social is there some nuance that I’m missing (or that got eliminated in the editing process)?
“Well, everyone knows the Citizenship Clause was enacted to overturn Dred Scott. What this op-ed presupposes is... maybe it didn't.”
February 15, 2025 at 9:17 PM
“Well, everyone knows the Citizenship Clause was enacted to overturn Dred Scott. What this op-ed presupposes is... maybe it didn't.”
Maybe he just wants to give a local boy credit?
February 12, 2024 at 2:33 PM
Maybe he just wants to give a local boy credit?
Is this not the original order? Or if not, isn’t this the order they are responding to?
December 20, 2023 at 3:35 AM
Is this not the original order? Or if not, isn’t this the order they are responding to?
Heaven forfend! But since it’s in the future tense maybe that’s the problem—it was aspirational?
December 13, 2023 at 4:54 AM
Heaven forfend! But since it’s in the future tense maybe that’s the problem—it was aspirational?