Antibiotic Steward 🅱️C🆔🅿️🌟
@absteward.bsky.social
Stay up-to-date in Infectious Diseases, Clinical Pharmacist, Antibiotics, #IDTwitter t✨p influencer #interstellar #dune
🌹❤️Misk #idsky #medsky #AMSsky #idxposts
Bassam Ghanem,PharmD MS BCPS BCIDP
🌹❤️Misk #idsky #medsky #AMSsky #idxposts
Bassam Ghanem,PharmD MS BCPS BCIDP
Yeah
Non cUTI indications?
Duration of Rx in cUTI?
Non cUTI indications?
Duration of Rx in cUTI?
November 5, 2025 at 5:02 PM
Yeah
Non cUTI indications?
Duration of Rx in cUTI?
Non cUTI indications?
Duration of Rx in cUTI?
Did you mean the original table?
But where's the peer review?
I quickly scanned the article and found it 😞
The peer review process has become become really disappointing lately
But where's the peer review?
I quickly scanned the article and found it 😞
The peer review process has become become really disappointing lately
October 24, 2025 at 11:22 AM
Did you mean the original table?
But where's the peer review?
I quickly scanned the article and found it 😞
The peer review process has become become really disappointing lately
But where's the peer review?
I quickly scanned the article and found it 😞
The peer review process has become become really disappointing lately
I couldn't find Pichia parapsilosis in any current taxonomy databases or any references
The correct name remains Candida parapsilosis
It’s very likely the authors simply confused the genus with Pichia pastoris or it was a typo missed during peer review
The correct name remains Candida parapsilosis
It’s very likely the authors simply confused the genus with Pichia pastoris or it was a typo missed during peer review
October 24, 2025 at 10:48 AM
I couldn't find Pichia parapsilosis in any current taxonomy databases or any references
The correct name remains Candida parapsilosis
It’s very likely the authors simply confused the genus with Pichia pastoris or it was a typo missed during peer review
The correct name remains Candida parapsilosis
It’s very likely the authors simply confused the genus with Pichia pastoris or it was a typo missed during peer review