solution feels obvious (secret objective feedback earlier) which makes me think I don't understand the actual problem
solution feels obvious (secret objective feedback earlier) which makes me think I don't understand the actual problem
cursed version would be replace FYP with chat box
cursed version would be replace FYP with chat box
like the final clause isn't even clearly attached to 'by the speaker'
given where things are, why not just use a notary like coolidge
like the final clause isn't even clearly attached to 'by the speaker'
given where things are, why not just use a notary like coolidge
robert cover's 'violence and the word' makes a similar point, law must unify people unwilling to do violence with people who would use it irresponsibly
robert cover's 'violence and the word' makes a similar point, law must unify people unwilling to do violence with people who would use it irresponsibly
> under a regime of permanent full employment, the 'sack' would cease to play its role as a disciplinary measure
> under a regime of permanent full employment, the 'sack' would cease to play its role as a disciplinary measure
> For us to speak with the young becomes ever more difficult. We see it as a duty and, at the same time, as a risk: the risk of appearing anachronistic, of not being listened to.
> For us to speak with the young becomes ever more difficult. We see it as a duty and, at the same time, as a risk: the risk of appearing anachronistic, of not being listened to.
from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK294...
from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK294...