I’m not a fan of his at all, but with a less cynical reading he’s right in a macro sense - the ratio of working people to elderly/retired is completely flipping, and the social supports we rely on stop working when there are fewer workers to support us, aka, the kids we have now.

This is a bizarre take: automating most of the work your firm does…makes more room at the top? This is really not how it’s going to go - what you’re seeing is a services firm become a software firm - one requires a lot of labor…the other does not.

I mean, the one thing you can say for a Trump candidacy is that it will certainly get out the vote.

Everyone was reeeaaallly quiet when Canada said they had carried out an assassination here...turns out it's not so isolated.

Citizens with an ongoing interest in democracy.

I'm not saying it's anyone's fault - but elections, by nature, can go either way. When one of the options might have civilizational consequences, it raises the stakes a bit more than I'd like, that's all. I wish having two good options to choose from didn't sound unreasonable.

I think that's a key objective here: having the choice between two viable, non-catastrophic candidates.