That's always the context of my content.

If you didn't concern yourself about your revelations on naivety, I definitely won't worry about your critiques on my fragmented articulation.

In visual communication, there doesn't have to be a verb. Context and content can just be.

I'm lost on how it was labeled discrimination for protected groups? I get the joke...just not the weird label for censorship... "shrugs"

The image has been hidden and labeled intolerance?

Inmate...trauma informed, educator, volunteer, advocate.. labels to some, insults to others, informed behavior to onlookers.

Or naiveté. It's a nice sentiment or can be an obvious red flag if you can not appropriately categorize those cues.

It's teachable. For some people it is not learnable...that is a symptom. Sarcasm is not a satisfactory form of communication. Recognition of it is mainstream. Inability to recognize some "not-so-subtle" cues in speech can indicate physical or health concerns.

If a person cannot fathom sarcasm...it's hard teaching people sarcasm.

..another occuring March 15th.