That depends on whether you are interested in explicit or tacit knowledge, writes @tommyblanchard.bsky.social.
Sometimes the former alone is really not enough, and podcasts can contain lots of the latter:
buff.ly/M6NgPOd
That depends on whether you are interested in explicit or tacit knowledge, writes @tommyblanchard.bsky.social.
Sometimes the former alone is really not enough, and podcasts can contain lots of the latter:
buff.ly/M6NgPOd
open.substack.com/pub/cognitiv...
open.substack.com/pub/cognitiv...
It is widely believed they don’t (because of how they are built and work), but it’s not that clear cut, argues @tommyblanchard.bsky.social:
buff.ly/Smaypaw
It is widely believed they don’t (because of how they are built and work), but it’s not that clear cut, argues @tommyblanchard.bsky.social:
buff.ly/Smaypaw
About how the things we're immersed in are often invisible to us. "There's nothing we're more immersed in than the workings of our own brains."
About how the things we're immersed in are often invisible to us. "There's nothing we're more immersed in than the workings of our own brains."
"In a very real sense, we are stuck in our skulls, figuring out what's going on in the world from the measurements of various instruments."
"In a very real sense, we are stuck in our skulls, figuring out what's going on in the world from the measurements of various instruments."
"Saying you’re addicted to dopamine is like saying you’re looking at your own retina: you can’t do that, it’s too fundamental to the process."
"Saying you’re addicted to dopamine is like saying you’re looking at your own retina: you can’t do that, it’s too fundamental to the process."
All about scanning fish brains, fMRI statistics, and overzealous skepticism
"A little over 15 years ago, some researchers put a salmon into an fMRI scanner."
All about scanning fish brains, fMRI statistics, and overzealous skepticism
"A little over 15 years ago, some researchers put a salmon into an fMRI scanner."
cognitivewonderland....
cognitivewonderland....
Disagreement doesn't mean irrationality: people interpret the same evidence differently due to prior beliefs and trusted sources. Being charitable, rather than dismissive, helps us understand—and maybe even persuade—those who disagree.
Disagreement doesn't mean irrationality: people interpret the same evidence differently due to prior beliefs and trusted sources. Being charitable, rather than dismissive, helps us understand—and maybe even persuade—those who disagree.
Talking about why you shouldn't sweat decisions so much. More generally on power laws, touching on linguistics, Sturgeon's law, data science, and decision theory.
Talking about why you shouldn't sweat decisions so much. More generally on power laws, touching on linguistics, Sturgeon's law, data science, and decision theory.
cognitivewonderland....
cognitivewonderland....
The Friendship Paradox and other adventures in sampling bias
The Friendship Paradox and other adventures in sampling bias
I still have a very incomplete picture but based on what I have been told, the damage to NIH and to many wonderful people who work(ed) there is/was impossible for me to imagine
1/n
"We don't just have a "smart mode" (System 2) and "dumb mode" (System 1). Instead, we have a collection of tools for thinking and deciding."
"We don't just have a "smart mode" (System 2) and "dumb mode" (System 1). Instead, we have a collection of tools for thinking and deciding."
Exploring the psychology of what makes things interesting, and the relationship between our curiosity and complexity. Also has my wife's drawing of a cow.
Exploring the psychology of what makes things interesting, and the relationship between our curiosity and complexity. Also has my wife's drawing of a cow.
@tommyblanchard.bsky.social cognitivewonderland.substack.com/p/3-neuromyt...
@tommyblanchard.bsky.social cognitivewonderland.substack.com/p/3-neuromyt...