Paul Thurrott
banner
thurrott.bsky.social
Paul Thurrott
@thurrott.bsky.social
Personal technology, with a focus on productivity, mostly Microsoft.
"Windows 11 version 26H1 is coming this Spring"

Thanks, Captain Obvious.
January 7, 2026 at 6:20 PM
Medium Tech? ⭐
In the 1980s, Sam Adams was a local phenomenon in the Boston area where I lived, and it was, at first, a novel outlier, a craft brewery in a world dominated by Big Beer. As a regular patron at Doyle’s Cafe in the Boston suburbs, I was familiar with Sam Adams early on, and there were fanciful rumors that the beer was delivered to the restaurant and bar from the local brewery underground in pipes. Sam Adams didn’t stay local. It exploded in popularity in the 1990s as the country and then the world embraced so-called craft beers and the craft breweries that made them. This required its parent company, the Boston Beer Company, to acquire and build breweries around the country so that it could meet the demand more easily. At some point, the Boston Beer Company crossed an all-defined line between being a craft brewery and just being an enormous company that made beer and other alcoholic drinks. Because of the explosive growth of Sam Adams and other bigger craft beers, the Brewers Association that oversees this market proposed changing its definition of what constitutes an American craft brewer. And that change meant that the company behind Sam Adams was no longer a craft beer maker. The Boston Beer Company fought this change because being a craft beer maker was so central to its image. But it wasn’t just bigger than other craft brewers, it was getting as big as some Big Beer makers too, with national and international distribution and annual unit sales in the millions of barrels. This is no mom and pop operation anymore. I don’t know a lot about the beer industry, nor do I care all that much. But I do know that it has endured a lot of consolidation in the last couple of decades, with obvious parallels to our industry. Big Beer today consists of just major companies—AB InBev, SABMiller, Heineken, and Carlsberg—that by some measures collectively control about 90 percent of the market. Meanwhile, 8 of the biggest companies in the world by market capitalization—Nvidia, Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, TSMC, Broadcom, and Meta—are Big Tech companies and each is dominant in its own way. More to the point, we also have personal technology companies that straddle the line, or exist in a gray space, between Big Tech and Little Tech. These companies earn billions of dollars in revenue each year, so they are objectively “big” even though they’re not big enough, by any measure, to qualify as Big Tech. Likewise, some of them are even market leaders, and though none I can think of are outright dominating any important or big market, that confuses matters further. What companies am I referring to? There are probably dozens or even hundreds of them, but the most obvious that come to mind are Spotify and Epic Games. None of these companies are on a list of the top 100 companies by market cap, where the smallest include Intuit, Qualcomm, and Intel. But they’re not Little Tech, right? I don’t know. If you want to arg... The post Medium Tech? ⭐ appeared first on Thurrott.com.
dlvr.it
January 7, 2026 at 5:11 PM
From the Editor’s Desk: Pragmatic ⭐
As an Amiga user and enthusiast in the late 1980s and early 1990s, I was not impressed with Microsoft or anything it made, especially Windows. PCs of that era booted into a limited MS-DOS command line environment, which I found quaint, and true multitasking was mostly an unfulfilled promise. But the Amiga failed along with Commodore, and when I decided to return to school in my late 20s to study software development, the only question was whether I would need a PC or a Mac. And that meant there was really no question at all, since the computer science college classes at that time all assumed the PC. I had used the original IBM PC and some clones by that point, but my funds were tight, so I started pricing out the components I would need to build my first PC. Its barely beating heart was an AMD 386SX because it was so much cheaper than the real Intel chips, including the expensive 80486. It would be enough. I continued to be unimpressed with the PC as a platform. But in time, a few things changed and helped to alter my opinions about Microsoft and its software. The professor of a networking class recommended that I check out Windows for Workgroups, which I did, and I found its 32-bit memory and disk access options even more compelling than its networking functionality. My wife worked at a training company that got pre-release versions of the Microsoft Office 6.0 suite, and I was blown away by the quality of the apps, especially Microsoft Word. Visual Basic had its warts but it was still an impressive way to create apps visually and quickly. And then I got caught up in what became my career and found myself using an early beta of Windows 4.0, soon renamed to Windows 95, that was quite interesting to me. I also bought Charles Petzold’s iconic book Programming Windows (the 3.1 edition, I believe) and read and re-read it, amazed by how complex it all was. And while this may seem odd, that complexity helped shift my opinions, too, as it was so technical and difficult to understand. Clearly, this was a sophisticated environment, I believed. (Now I realize it was just complex and poorly designed.) I had a similar reaction with the Microsoft Foundation Classes (MFC), a horrible “wrapper” a few years later. This all happened in the early 1990s. In From the Editor’s Desk: Early Influences ⭐, I wrote about the “era” that, for me, ran from about 1978 to 1993, a 15-year period in which I was what I would now call a personal technology enthusiast. 1993 was (again, for me) what we now call an inflection point, a slice in time when everything changes and this hobby, this enthusiasm, turned into a life’s work. In that earlier post, I noted that we moved to Phoenix in 1993 and that the movie Jurassic Park and the videogame Star Wars: X-Wing were both released that year too. But 1993 was also the beginning of a new era in which I became part of the tech industry, in a peripheral sense, through the writing of books. The first of whi... The post From the Editor’s Desk: Pragmatic ⭐ appeared first on Thurrott.com.
dlvr.it
January 6, 2026 at 10:55 PM