@vermontgmg.bsky.social
I can’t believe your answer to the initial question on CNN at the top of this hour didn’t make people at the table do a double take. A discouraging sign. (I think you’re right, sadly.)
I can’t believe your answer to the initial question on CNN at the top of this hour didn’t make people at the table do a double take. A discouraging sign. (I think you’re right, sadly.)
August 5, 2025 at 2:54 AM
@vermontgmg.bsky.social
I can’t believe your answer to the initial question on CNN at the top of this hour didn’t make people at the table do a double take. A discouraging sign. (I think you’re right, sadly.)
I can’t believe your answer to the initial question on CNN at the top of this hour didn’t make people at the table do a double take. A discouraging sign. (I think you’re right, sadly.)
@profgalloway.com @karaswisher.bsky.social
Reducing taking over the Panama Canal to its economic value as you did on today’s podcast shows you’re not supple enough in your thinking. Think about what controlling who gets through it, ie who doesn’t, can do for a chaos agent like Trump.
Reducing taking over the Panama Canal to its economic value as you did on today’s podcast shows you’re not supple enough in your thinking. Think about what controlling who gets through it, ie who doesn’t, can do for a chaos agent like Trump.
January 11, 2025 at 4:56 AM
@profgalloway.com @karaswisher.bsky.social
Reducing taking over the Panama Canal to its economic value as you did on today’s podcast shows you’re not supple enough in your thinking. Think about what controlling who gets through it, ie who doesn’t, can do for a chaos agent like Trump.
Reducing taking over the Panama Canal to its economic value as you did on today’s podcast shows you’re not supple enough in your thinking. Think about what controlling who gets through it, ie who doesn’t, can do for a chaos agent like Trump.