Paolo Tamase
pstamase.bsky.social
Paolo Tamase
@pstamase.bsky.social
Asst. Prof., Univ. of the Phil. College of Law (Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Local Governments, Public Officers, Legal History, Legal Theory) | LL.M. ‘22, Yale Law School | Views are my own.
Very grateful to PLJ for publishing this. It's a long read, but the summary is that while there are conflicting views, an accountability-based reading of the PH Constitution requires impeachment to proceed, allowing the people themselves to evaluate the case for/against VP Duterte.
𝗣𝗟𝗝 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝘂𝗺: In the inaugural full-length piece of the Philippine Law Journal Forum, Paolo Tamase (@pstamase.bsky.social) writes about five emerging issues in impeachment.

Read more: philippinelawjournal.org/forum/post/e...
June 2, 2025 at 2:42 AM
Subject to a longer piece, I have deep concerns with the OSG’s claim that it can refuse to defend if it disagrees with the position of the current gov’t. The OSG is its statutory counsel. So if at all, the decision not to defend should come from the client, not the lawyer. 1/2
March 17, 2025 at 11:46 AM
Enjoyed writing this with @sosyolohija.bsky.social (with much encouragement from @rosselle.bsky.social). Hoping this opens a discussion on an often neglected aspect of the current impeachment saga—one beyond the legalese—i.e., its shifting function in Philippine democracy.
Independent of its merits, Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment exposes the tension between political agendas and constitutional principles, highlighting risks to democratic integrity, write Paolo S Tamase and Athena Charanne Presto.
Impeachment a key weapon in the Philippines’ Marcos–Duterte divide
Independent of its merits, Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment exposes the tension between political agendas and constitutional principles, highlighting risks to democratic integrity, write Paolo S Tamase and Athena Charanne Presto.
eastasiaforum.org
March 10, 2025 at 12:38 PM
Wrote this impeachment primer with Nick Castro ‘25, Jill Chua ‘26, Jules Espino ‘26 and Ardy Mercado ‘26. Grateful for UP Law’s encouragement and helpful feedback of colleagues. Hoping it contributes to more informed discussions on the PH political drama of the season. Link: uplaw.ph/impeachmentp...
February 7, 2025 at 7:53 AM
Nothing wrong with celebrating new lawyers. But if we have Court-centered ceremonies, complete with year-long virtual brand campaigns, are we still celebrating the admission of new lawyers or something else? I think it’s a fair question to ask.
Simple po sagot, Prof. @pstamase.bsky.social. Mabigat sa bulsa, matagal, at mahirap mag-aral ng abogasya sa Pilipinas. Di pwede JD agad after HS. Sasalain sa law school at bar exam. Dapat ipagdiwang ang pinaghirapan. Maybe it would be wise to also rethink legal ed in PH? #btin #emirsbtin
This would have been an email in New York.

(Which would have prevented the accidental posting before a, most respectfully, unnecessary press conference; word spreading among examinees; withdrawing the posting; causing anxiety to those who saw the result/got word, etc.)
December 13, 2024 at 5:16 PM
This would have been an email in New York.

(Which would have prevented the accidental posting before a, most respectfully, unnecessary press conference; word spreading among examinees; withdrawing the posting; causing anxiety to those who saw the result/got word, etc.)
December 13, 2024 at 4:32 AM
The PH Supreme Court’s intent-based standard for plagiarism is a bigger threat to academic/rsch integrity in law schools than AI. In this piece now on Hein, I revisit the Vinuya saga to argue for prohibiting plagiarism for efficiency-based reasons. Thanks to the PLJ for publishing my views! 1/2
The Issue concludes with an essay by UP Law Assistant Professor Paolo S. Tamase which shows how the understanding of plagiarism attributable to the case of Vinuya v. Romulo has shaped legal research ethics. heinonline.org/HOL/Page?han...
November 29, 2024 at 11:34 AM
Reposted by Paolo Tamase
Interesting (and heartening) piece from my colleague Bruce Ackerman www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/t...
Trump Won, but Trumpism Did Not | by Bruce Ackerman - Project Syndicate
Bruce Ackerman thinks the president-elect’s agenda will falter as many congressional Republicans eye the midterm elections.
www.project-syndicate.org
November 19, 2024 at 4:03 PM
Why do non-Americans care about US elections? In Quezon City PH, classes are cancelled for the nth time this term due to severe weather—the most I remember. Climate change is worsening inequalities in countries that contributed the least to it. But oh no the price of eggs and male loneliness
November 10, 2024 at 12:03 PM
Reposted by Paolo Tamase
Reposted by Paolo Tamase
We're so excited to host our Propaganda and Emerging Technologies conference next week! Join us for discussions on hate speech, misinformation, manipulation, electoral influence + more

Friday April 5 - Saturday April 6, 2024

Program and registration: law.yale.edu/isp/events/p...
March 27, 2024 at 2:12 PM
Great read from Akshat Agarwal. Students of conlaw who have seen maximalist-minimalist swings in their own apex courts can draw a lot of insights from this. Also a good reminder that judicial review has a different dynamic in the majority world—and even within, it varies widely.
"A sharp and worrying break."

This week, the Supreme Court of India rejected marriage equality in Indian law.

AKSHAT AGARWAL on constitutional interpretation as a terrain of contestation and the far-reaching implications of the decision for LGBTQ+ rights.

verfassungsblog.de/marriage-equ...
October 23, 2023 at 3:48 AM