🧵
minnesotalawreview.org/article/equi...
The latest? A new ruling that requires the police to record all interrogations from now on.
The author took it as an opportunity to say Hawaii's court will protect due process—while SCOTUS isn't:
law.shu.edu/news/seton-h...
law.shu.edu/news/seton-h...
@davidfrenchjag.bsky.social rightly finds this development deeply troubling.
🧵
minnesotalawreview.org/article/equi...
🧵
minnesotalawreview.org/article/equi...
If you want to learn more, I rec this piece from Greg Ablavsky & Bethany Berger. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
If you want to learn more, I rec this piece from Greg Ablavsky & Bethany Berger. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
But beyond its overtly political nature, experts say it does not meet the bare minimum of basic scientific standards.
I’m not saying it’s acceptable or that we ignore it. But when they tell you who they are, believe them.
Details w/ @joshgerstein.bsky.social
www.politico.com/news/2025/04...
I’m not saying it’s acceptable or that we ignore it. But when they tell you who they are, believe them.
www.law.com/njlawjournal...
www.law.com/njlawjournal...
www.law.com/njlawjournal...