I post about the mainstream media centering their reporting on conservatives; I also post on LGBT issues. Occasionally I write an article or two.
The unthinkable comes to Pa. coal country. My special report www.inquirer.com/opinion/ice-...
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
"the goal "is to limit confusion on U.S government policy & to speak with one voice to advance [Felon's rhetoric & lies]. It will preserve history while promoting the present."
Bullshit. '1984' crew in action again.
Keep capturing & documenting everything you can, all.
"the goal "is to limit confusion on U.S government policy & to speak with one voice to advance [Felon's rhetoric & lies]. It will preserve history while promoting the present."
Bullshit. '1984' crew in action again.
Keep capturing & documenting everything you can, all.
Because that is the only appropriate name for a group of them.
By @alyssaur.bsky.social
www.assignedmedia.org/breaking-new...
Because that is the only appropriate name for a group of them.
Please
But let’s play. Trump’s Truth Social missives have destroyed people’s lives. If they were issued by interns, Congress must investigate which and when-and massive lawsuits will be filed
A White House official blamed a staffer for erroneously posting the video.
Please
But let’s play. Trump’s Truth Social missives have destroyed people’s lives. If they were issued by interns, Congress must investigate which and when-and massive lawsuits will be filed
Don't you libs understand quantum mechanics?
Don't you libs understand quantum mechanics?
Or low-level staffers are anonymously setting presidential policies for the US via Trump’s official feed.
Or low-level staffers are anonymously setting presidential policies for the US via Trump’s official feed.
But even if they were telling the truth, "We give staffers who post videos of the Obamas as apes access to the agenda-setting, decree-sending, market-moving account of the president of the United States" is not the exculpatory statement they think it is.
But even if they were telling the truth, "We give staffers who post videos of the Obamas as apes access to the agenda-setting, decree-sending, market-moving account of the president of the United States" is not the exculpatory statement they think it is.
They hint that Epstein may have helped Russia gain leverage over Donald Trump, providing advice to individuals close to Putin on influencing a sitting US president.
This deserves far more public scrutiny:
They hint that Epstein may have helped Russia gain leverage over Donald Trump, providing advice to individuals close to Putin on influencing a sitting US president.
This deserves far more public scrutiny: